Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vsvvvc$36pju$8@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Past Blast - "Wonder Woman 1984" - Corp Guy Using PET
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 07:47:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <vsvvvc$36pju$8@dont-email.me>
References: <3LScnf6o-ddHmXD6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m55g9gF1fe1U1@mid.individual.net>
	<PrWcnfSsir_Q_3P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m5834aFe093U2@mid.individual.net>
	<vLqdnVb4yaZObXP6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m58omiFguqjU3@mid.individual.net> <20250404075333.000000fc@gmail.com>
	<pa2dnTX2hoJwW236nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m5c5f4F35tlU1@mid.individual.net>
	<gmmdnfQoUay9dW36nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m5dgomF9mvkU2@mid.individual.net>
	<X0idnaa5DI6SXGz6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
	<slrnvv3hr3.g7g.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 09:47:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f78cf1e5c1ddc713eed346e8c1706a10";
	logging-data="3368574"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/NAVMjZsjni6opVISsTGs"
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:H7+VTn0ijDKz7VmgsXKqZc23G30=
Bytes: 2248

On 6 Apr 2025 00:14:27 GMT, Robert Riches wrote:

> I don't have chapter and verse to quote, but back in the day I was told
> that the original design of the 6502 _WAS_ superior to the 6809, but
> Motorola sued on a basis of IP theft or similar, and the 6502 was dumbed
> down by removing registers and/or crippling the indexing modes.

No, that would have been the Motorola 6800. The 6809 came somewhat later.

The main rivalry in the 8-bit world was between the 6502 and the Z80. 6502 
fans liked to tout the fact that their fave CPU had so many instructions 
that would execute in one clock cycle ... until you looked closer and 
discovered that it was restricting itself to 8-bit address arithmetic, 
where the Z80 was supporting full 16-bit addresses.