Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vt0t9o$1bt9g$1@news.xmission.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Beyond the pale... (Was: do { quit; } else { }) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:08:24 -0000 (UTC) Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium Message-ID: <vt0t9o$1bt9g$1@news.xmission.com> References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <20250406162607.0000657a@yahoo.com> <vsu2fn$1a55i$1@news.xmission.com> <vsu5dj$19k7e$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:08:24 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4"; logging-data="1439024"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) Bytes: 2195 Lines: 27 In article <vsu5dj$19k7e$1@dont-email.me>, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: .... >> The language he uses in this thread is just beyond the pale (*) in terms of >> rudeness and non-civility. If his target was anyone else (and especially >> if it was an old regular), we'd probably have 20 posts already condemning >> his language. >> >> (*) I think that's the right spelling - for a phrase I've only heard and >> have never seen written down. Or is it "pail" ? >> > >It's even more off-topic, but I like to answer questions when asked - >yes, you are correct that it is "pale", from an old word for post or >fence (with similar etymology to "post", as in "wooden post"). Thus >"beyond the pale" is outside the borders or boundaries of your little >bit of civilisation. Thanks. That is useful to know. But then I wonder if there is any connection between the word "pale" meaning "post" and its modern meaning (as in "A Whiter Shade of Pale"). -- The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL: http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/FiftyPercent