Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Regular MSNBC Guest: All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be "Presumptively Unconstitutional"
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:16:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <vt1bq1$gk6v$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vt0ejl$3inef$10@dont-email.me> <vt0vdi$6rq6$3@dont-email.me> <vt18g1$e0ka$2@dont-email.me> <vt1b0p$ihrk$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 22:16:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6d16272b71a896eae4bf4d27227699a8";
	logging-data="544991"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lrFN/o9bkZLETNLLnarmh8mCYTjcyTRM="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:V+2x9MnXQhG0Hptajg7wN7Y/Muw=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 3109

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>Apr 7, 2025 at 12:19:29 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

>>Here's a citation to the story Ubi the shithead plagarized.

>>https://www.dailywire.com/news/regular-msnbc-guest-all-laws-passed-before-1965-should-be-presumptively-unconstitutional

>>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>Apr 7, 2025 at 1:30:50 AM PDT, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

>>>>Regular MSNBC guest and justice correspondent for The Nation Elie Mystal 
>>>>claimed on Tuesday that virtually all laws passed prior to 1965 should be 
>>>>considered "presumptively unconstitutional".

>>>>"Yes, absolutely," Mystal declared. "One of my premises for the book
>>>>is that every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be
>>>>presumptively unconstitutional, right? Because before the 1965 Voting
>>>>Rights Act, we were functionally an apartheid country. Not everybody
>>>>who lived here could vote here."

>>>This flesh-blob and his goofy white 'fro is not only ridiculously hard-left
>>>but he doesn't even make any sense.

>>>First, it's *still* the case that not everyone who lives here can
>>>vote here.  Foreign nationals, both legal and illegal, cannot vote
>>>even if they live here.

>>>He says every pre-1965 law is unconstitutional but the Constitution
>>>itself is a pre-1965 law. So this idiot must believe the Constitution
>>>is unconstitutional, which is a logical and legal impossibility.

>>Does that include the post-Civil War civil rights legislation written by
>>the Radical Republicans, all of which was found CONSTITUTIONAL and in
>>force by the Supreme Court under Earl Warren? Even Hansberry v. Lee
>>(Hansberry was the father of Lorraine Hansberry) was decided in 1940,
>>under Charles Hughes.

>>Does that include the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

>And since the 13th Amendment was passed in 1865, well before Mystal's cutoff,
>I guess slavery's back on the menu, boys!

Go bigger!

There were no blacks in Europe during the Age of Enlightenment! It's all
invalid. Western civilization has been returned to the Dark Ages!