Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vt2512$16844$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 23:26:26 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vt2512$16844$1@dont-email.me>
References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vsj1m8$1f8h2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsj2l9$1j0as$1@dont-email.me> <vsjgk0$207gb$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <vsjkc8$252sk$1@dont-email.me> <vspvqk$sl3u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vt229e$15gkb$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 05:26:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a82decdcecbf2be3578dae3b9c5284d3";
	logging-data="1253508"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ZKHB4hlpkwUvI4i/8V4vfmv2duu7Khlg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+9rXD+WcoDYCCU8s3eRai9ITFsE=
In-Reply-To: <vt229e$15gkb$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2276

On 4/7/25 22:39, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 21:08:36 -0400, James Kuyper wrote:
> 
>> There exist many programs that can compile either C code and C++ code,
>> depending either upon the extension of the file name or explicit command
>> line options to determine which language's rules to apply.
> 
> But note that the *nix tradition is for the “cc” command to invoke nothing 
> more than a “driver” program, which processes each input file according to 
> its extension by spawning additional processes running the actual file-
> specific processors. And these processors include the linker, for 
> combining object files created by the various compilers into an actual 
> executable (or perhaps a shared library).

My point was that it doesn't matter if the same program can process C++
code, and also accepts VMTs when processing C code. The question was
whether it accepts VMTs when processing C++ code. Whether it executes
some other program to actually process the code, or does the processing
itself, is irrelevant to that issue.