| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vt3kljhqa92u0ljonl7iivu1o8clkkd7of@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:24:37 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 106 Message-ID: <vt3kljhqa92u0ljonl7iivu1o8clkkd7of@4ax.com> References: <vgbjljtt6rmg7vi7qmbba36v4t94k02jro@4ax.com> <vjchjq$1ku28$3@dont-email.me> <bmijljh1sfuor9cvne3pf2aeio596vt82t@4ax.com> <vjcl2u$1llo0$1@dont-email.me> <7imjljd1v6pn0he0s7hfu2p7uja4uls97l@4ax.com> <vjcmic$1llu4$2@dont-email.me> <dsnjljthl4vqeq17ohootp3v2s5vio6hd6@4ax.com> <vjcnts$1llu4$6@dont-email.me> <v5pjlj9v73kl21ssi0oq4l94pheo118720@4ax.com> <vjcopm$1mcuj$1@dont-email.me> <b8qjljdnd1ehmmbcsrj2oqu38ir9kk1hfi@4ax.com> <vjd031$1noq5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:24:38 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52d118c05b35d7295e14a7b474a602e0"; logging-data="1851035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sqaOnRdS8nFiJxzlZYB65V+yPY8K7gY4=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kpn4jqWUwlh6LpAA6nOnxpcKJ9I= OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Bytes: 4486 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>> High-end PCs can benefit >>>> from M$'s tinkering [to make Windows 11 just right]. >>> >>> Give an example. >> >> Well, boot Win11 24H2 on a nice 13th gen i7, and you have a great >> experience. That's what Microsoft supports. Linux is the solution >> for others, but they often overlook it. > >In what way is booting that a better experience than booting macOS >Sequoia 15.1.1 on an M3 Mac? > >Be specific (for once). macOS just isn't something suitable for the norm, but to people caught in Apple land it seems to be. >>>>>>>> They depend on >>>>>>>> Microsoft and Adobe to develop applications. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apple makes computers and other computing devices and the operating >>>>>>> systems for those devices along with many applications to run on them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Microsoft is more full-service. >>>>> >>>>> Again... ...to the END USER, how does that matter? >>>>> >>>>> What matters is that the END USER can find the software he or she needs >>>>> to get his or her tasks done. >>>>> >>>>> And for almost every ordinary task, that software (often the exact same >>>>> software) is available for macOS. >>>> >>>> Simple people like simple things, I suppose. >>> >>> What's a complex thing that can't be done on a Mac? >> >> Nothing. > >So you have no actual answer. > >You can't produce a single example of a complex thing that can't be done >on a Mac. > >Got it. It was acknowledgement of your point. macOS has every capability that WinNT and Linux have. >>>>>>>> I actually enjoyed >>>>>>>> seeing the free trial of M$ Office for Mac. Showed it to my mom, >>>>>>>> who's always used Office for Winblows. The Mac version of Office is >>>>>>>> actually great software. And I imagine Adobe's stuff is pretty great >>>>>>>> on it, and the movie editing, etc. But for a typical PC user, posting >>>>>>>> on Usenet everyday, macOS is a quirky choice. >>>>>>> Again with the "quirky". >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, wear it. >>>>> >>>>> Not until you define it. >>>> >>>> It's self-evident, Apple supplies a quirky corner of the market. >>> >>> That's another non-answer. >> >> I was blown away by Finder. Really amusing, how little effort Apple's >> programmers put in. > >As opposed to what? Windows, several Linux file programs. >What specifically do you not like about the Finder? It's just basic and clunky, or was in ... >And how out-of-date is your experience of it; Snow Leopard? Very little since. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.