Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Celestino =?iso-8859-1?q?Schr=E4der?= <sr@elcsdtg.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of Einstein's physics
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:43:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vt3n8a$2odo7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1832b7b12c9a5cee$977009$1494137$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
	<vsu6pt$1b2f8$1@dont-email.me>
	<1raez2z.1no9njg1siqjbiN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
	<183412b0f9ddf64f$271308$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
	<vt11ag$91g5$1@dont-email.me>
	<1834424b910ea01e$278935$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 19:43:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e1fdd568e640ffd5eae888c26e940160";
	logging-data="2897671"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ElhiwG7QJKRbvJN5cF4w0/Bz5jbjg7yw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.9.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IlfHkBBdoZ4lvAsmkPtzJBiIoVc=
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEXyAgD++ADw
 gQD//gD//wDxpQD1wQDpAADqBQDsAADsGADrOwDtAADuAAD64ADsXwBxU1iYAAA
 CLklEQVQ4jaXSTWgTQRQA4BJQFBXBrB4aSAglF+MPYTY5LshuPPZg8Q9BrUVoA1
 Hwll7UHoRAiaUHcWFjqR6kkBbsoRhsU/GgGfLG1ECJG3e61DVFmiLkUk9Jnf6Q7
 mxaUBwY2J1v3pt5M9MB+7SO/wJd3wcq2b2AGPA1MGe0ARkx6MLo96ThBOy6M4tJ
 M+YEnPCL3jNkzDvrBJegXHwNUK9pPCz4RXRNBXJAmjA4cLkV6RHbwiFrgIvAdUU
 W+1kW0uXTuIiPYtiKDLMZUxIP+d6rOdS/OUNu8HUMaYUfkSTAonLdUTmM5MQYwK
 gSd5wVwDcrkoHiHkBzKAYlZaANoMBC2tegGuAmir1Ajl2RChswhe4uKckBKdw8Q
 alWRyhM+YgpCd2n5LigrPKVV/p8PaHq5XuiUuNAb0rZD24RybIsZe1QFDyH0zOC
 Ip/0KzU7jIfOgo6nr1zKlNw7q2/Dm60/PU2Oan7fMRuYjVb55pw9VXr3oVH+ztv
 bDlD2njFlt8I+OVBVAI0NJzQOykPL1ckHm7135d2vu8MteN63Yr1lvdFzavn8BS
 vegsVwsvQyMlGcjkya89EnnS1I/aTk8ypVlzrTZTNsg1e3gTyOazi1xo6te/uVb
 sE4y/qF9dSaAQ+laqYFSx7IP/MY+YM+gKfR97vbHfOeXp/3Btc3vMGZjaitjk/+
 UCh7DoV+NxHiAI4EgonBwA29Erg1GLQDUQ0DlwnGekInf3e6/wB/AO+mMIOzpYt
 OAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
X-Face: ,CO^sd$X[&tf"SG7+?Y#bN7F>-z>m<&5.<FD!eYEhSh^q5:ZPI:ys)oOlD`td%rQ
 [hU2i..?e7]oN_:v=>Q@.:_KlRRHZF9BLP%G`hn56!#'T'|A-y)I%Z<SYUt>3[ZPsUjQy?'
 p2QKEz^OJ9XQoQ^bfwN\F5".09QOq<qk_qF7mkX:!Z%.Z=WudLLL*Dm*}`Y~JZM_.^h2!^/
 x=*dl})fI>zj/nk
Bytes: 3974

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

> W dniu 07.04.2025 o 19:17, Benito Grünewald pisze:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> 
>>>>> That implies knowing solar days exactly. Here more to undrestand
>>>>> seconds. The mechanics of it.
>>>>> ????? ???? ????? ?? ? ?????????? ?? ???????
>>>>> https://%42i%74%43hute.com/vi%44eo/lgGMsNdPNANx
>>>>
>>>> It helps even more to understand that the particular definition of
>>>> any unit of time is completely irrelevant for any kind of physics.
>>>> Physical results cannot depend on it, by definition,
>>>
>>> Can't they? By definition? By WHAT definition, poor trash?
>>> Anyway, they absolutely do. And you're a reality denier, as expected
>>> from a relativistic idiot.
>> 
>> please be careful, I can see now he is also wrong, but no reason to
>> apply insults. I hate insults.
> 
> You're a troll on the leash of a piece of shit from Moscow, why would
> anyone care what you hate or not.

can't you see the man is german, you stupid polak. Indeed, the gay polakia 
is a Russian province. You don't know your history, you indolent polak.

>> Time is not about definitions, since it's a dimension
> 
> It absolutely is about definitions, since it's a dimension. All
> abstracts are about definitions.

a dimension is not abstract, you puerile deplorable imbecile. You are 
educated like shit in that gay polakia.