| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vt3phv$2pdhk$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: The People Versus John Oliver: The Murky Ethics Of Modern Comedy Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:22:54 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: <vt3phv$2pdhk$2@dont-email.me> References: <vt31vr$23bvq$4@dont-email.me> <vt3jsm$2kcep$2@dont-email.me> <e7lavjtbapael4ecv6oepusdsk8bfc7vht@4ax.com> <vt3kvb$2kcep$5@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 20:22:55 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a77611f04bc5de34fc7d36efdfc08cbc"; logging-data="2930228"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4ZnNdQcLeqrEUPi9Ka+CypUlEo1PQQbM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1://YjBlSWU0zTFnnRIsPolVvrOxY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vt3kvb$2kcep$5@dont-email.me> On 4/8/2025 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Apr 8, 2025 at 10:00:28 AM PDT, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:46:14 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 8, 2025 at 1:30:43 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >> >>>> Take Bill Burr, who insinuated Kyle Rittenhouse was a White Supremacist >>>> during his Netflix special "Bill Burr Presents: Friends Who Kill". >>>> >>>> Rittenhouse shot three people, killing two and injuring one during a 2020 >>>> fracas tied to the BLM protests. A court of law found him innocent, >>>> agreeing >>>> with his self-defense explanation. Elements of the press and the Left >>>> insisted his actions were racist, even though his victims were white and >>>> they >>>> >>>> couldn't pin any racially-charged comments to the young man. >>> >>> That's still the most bizarre aspect of that whole case: a white guy shoots >>> two other white guys and the black grievance brigade starts screaming >>> "raaaaciiism!!" >>> >>> Come again? >> >> I think it's more of why he traveled across state lines to supposedly >> protect a business. > > And how was *that* racist? > >> That he ended up shooting some white guys doesn't >> get around the fact that he was there to supposedly protect the >> business from BLM protestors. > > So now it's racist to protect your property from vandalism and looting if it's > being done by blacks? Of course it is, if you ignore it when it's being done by whites. >