Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vt5254$nsu$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { } Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 22:55:47 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 64 Message-ID: <vt5254$nsu$1@dont-email.me> References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vsph6b$ce6m$5@dont-email.me> <86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com> <86ecy5fjin.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406190321.000001dc@yahoo.com> <86plhodtsw.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com> <vt15lq$bjs0$3@dont-email.me> <vt2lp6$1qtjd$1@dont-email.me> <vt31m5$2513i$1@dont-email.me> <vt3d4g$2djqe$1@dont-email.me> <vt3iqh$2ka99$1@dont-email.me> <868qoaeezc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt3oeo$2oq3p$1@dont-email.me> <86mscqcpy1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt48go$35hh3$2@dont-email.me> <86iknecjz8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt4del$3a9sk$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d6b678eb7e1d3f498ba97e7a21a9aa05"; logging-data="24478"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yVITlxi9R9XbD/FA3Tbq6ZwRtuLFqyeg=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:zDiugPrWUDEDntOu9AYX5yd3SAY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vt4del$3a9sk$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3568 On 4/8/2025 5:02 PM, bart wrote: > On 09/04/2025 00:27, Tim Rentsch wrote: >> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > >>>> If you want to make a point or ask a question about C code, >>>> SHOW THE CODE. And show all of it. Don't make people guess >>>> by showing only some of the code or by giving just a description. >>> >>> I'm showing the code but you keep snipping it! [...] >> >> No, I don't. Don't be so obtuse. I included the code I was >> originally commenting on, in my first followup. My comment about >> showing code was about your second posting. Let me repeat the two >> important paragraphs (quoted above) taken from that posting: >> >>>>> I get an incompatible error (from the example you snipped) even when I >>>>> remove both struct tags. >> >> The phrase "even when I remove both struct tags" describes code, it >> doesn't show the code. > > I showed this example a few lines later which has both struct tags omitted: > > BC: > > Two typedefs for same struct layout appear to create distinct types; > > this fails: > > > > typedef struct {float x, y;} Point; > > typedef struct {float x, y;} vector; > > > > Point p; > > vector v; > > > > p=v; > > > But before I get there, I say: > > > I can't use the same struct tag in the same scope as one will clash with > > the other. > > That would be something like this: > > typedef struct tag {float x, y;} Point; > typedef struct tag {float x, y;} vector; > > I suggested: > > > > But if I have the second in an inner scope, then I again get > > the error. > > That would be something like this where both 'struct tag' can co-exist: > > typedef struct tag {float x, y;} Point; > { > typedef struct tag {float x, y;} vector; > ... rest of example that assigns v to p > } don't forget vec4 [...]