Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt (Halting Problem)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:56:20 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <vt7tj4$2iso2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vso4a5$302lq$1@dont-email.me> <vsqhuu$1hl94$2@dont-email.me> <vsqknb$1ldpa$1@dont-email.me> <vsrmn8$2o2f2$1@dont-email.me> <vstku7$p4u7$1@dont-email.me> <vsu95l$1c5kt$1@dont-email.me> <vt01l0$39kn7$1@dont-email.me> <vt28vk$1fe7a$1@dont-email.me> <vt2k6t$1onvt$1@dont-email.me> <vt3ef4$2flgf$1@dont-email.me> <vt3fgd$2gu7u$1@dont-email.me> <vt6apu$12sjs$2@dont-email.me> <vt6g1f$180qf$1@dont-email.me> <vt6lmk$1djk6$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b4a21209a9181fba4b7ec0042d3b531";
	logging-data="2716418"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19o0+I8bFL8bXMwcehYx3Sn"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A6GxBDDL0wvj/p9jDCg9iDzrCHI=
Bytes: 3942

On 2025-04-09 20:35:30 +0000, olcott said:

> On 4/9/2025 1:58 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 09.apr.2025 om 19:29 schreef olcott:
>>> 
>>> On 4/8/2025 10:31 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 08.apr.2025 om 17:13 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 4/8/2025 2:45 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 08.apr.2025 om 06:33 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>>>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> int DD()
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> int main()
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>    HHH(DD);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Simulating termination analyzer Principle*
>>>>>>> It is always correct for any simulating termination
>>>>>>> analyzer to stop simulating and reject any input that
>>>>>>> would otherwise prevent its own termination.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In this case there is nothing to prevent, because the finite string 
>>>>>> specifies a program that halts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> int DD()
>>>>> {
>>>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> This stuff is simply over-your-head.
>>>>> HHH(DD) meets the above: *Simulating termination analyzer Principle*
>>>>> Anyone with sufficient competence with the C programming language
>>>>> will understand this.
>>>>> 
>>>> Everyone with a little bit of C knowledge understands that if HHH 
>>>> returns with a value 0, then DDD halts.
>>> 
>>> DDD CORRECTLY SIMULATED BY HHH
>>> NOT ANY OTHER DAMN DDD IN THE UNIVERSE NITWIT.
>>> 
>> If HHH would correctly simulate DD (and the functions called by DD) 
>> then the simulated HHH would return to DD and DD would halt.
> 
> Simply over your level of technical competence.
> 
>> But HHH failed to complete the simulation of the halting program,
> 
> HHH is only required to report on the behavior of its
> own correct simulation (meaning the according to the
> semantics of the C programming language) and would be
> incorrect to report on any other behavior.
> 
>> because the programmer was dreaming of an infinite recursion.
>> 
>> If I didn't have to tell you this hundreds of times and you didn't
>> persist in the straw-man deception I would not have called you a nitwit.
>> 
>> 
> 
> I really think that you may simply be a troll playing head games.

It is not a good idea to think that everybody is just like you.

-- 
Mikko