Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: S2 - Ep1 The Robot Revolution - Press Review [article]
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 22:02:44 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vt8c12$2ulcu$2@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl> <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>
 <vt44ru$144i$5@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vt52vj$1fkj$1@dont-email.me>
 <vt5q4f$1ggi$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:02:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1d0b06d85ff8975fcbe7bc48e96b0def";
	logging-data="3102110"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dVPAK3845Avr26KOg9SZB"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fJqoO8wvy4AtvmxqmjBNS6UOWM0=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250410-2, 4/10/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vt5q4f$1ggi$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2462

On 9/04/2025 10:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <vt52vj$1fkj$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
> <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor
>>> <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>> On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
>>>>>> "The Robot Revolution"...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new 
>>>>>> companion, but with a preachy subtext"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Rating given 3/5
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> + + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://archive.ph/cpoGy
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sounds like me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I will review So I will skip this article.
>>>> 
>>>> When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
>>>> for you by AI?
>>>> 
>>> REcall The Timeless Children review?
>>> 
>> So like 5 or 6 years ago?
>> 
> Twice?

Yes, Binky, YOU did reply to Aggy's post TWICE!!
-- 
Daniel70