| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vta59k$ld9n$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:20:04 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 13 Message-ID: <vta59k$ld9n$1@dont-email.me> References: <vsn1fu$1p67k$1@dont-email.me> <vsng73$27sdj$1@dont-email.me> <gGKdnZiYPJVC03L6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vsnk2v$2fc5a$1@dont-email.me> <vsnmtg$2i4qp$3@dont-email.me> <vsno7m$2g4cd$3@dont-email.me> <vsnp0o$2ka6o$2@dont-email.me> <vsnpv4$2g4cd$6@dont-email.me> <vsntes$2osdn$1@dont-email.me> <vsntv3$2paf9$1@dont-email.me> <vso1a0$2sf7o$1@dont-email.me> <vso2ff$2tj1d$2@dont-email.me> <vso3rj$2vems$2@dont-email.me> <vso4gh$2vg3b$1@dont-email.me> <vsqmlb$1ktm5$6@dont-email.me> <vsr1ae$1pr17$2@dont-email.me> <vst4nm$8daf$2@dont-email.me> <vst8ci$aeqh$3@dont-email.me> <vsutjt$21mp2$2@dont-email.me> <vsuvp1$227l5$1@dont-email.me> <vsvv3h$36pju$2@dont-email.me> <vt01u5$38f07$1@dont-email.me> <875xjfd5rs.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vt1jpa$n43m$4@dont-email.me> <87tt6zblzl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <0920ac6e196c1cebeff36d8b9431ee12a7b3d527@i2pn2.org> <vt74k1$1pl6i$5@dont-email.me> <vt7sgd$2ht4t$1@dont-email.me> <vt9nq3$5t7s$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b00b5cbd09486fb855caeea624ce8c7"; logging-data="701751"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5Yvp0qjjCiuL3sUTaL/yKNfzWyNmPbPT5E7m9JSWaNQ==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fH2jvUps35ggl70bbkcHmOe4UDA= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <vt9nq3$5t7s$4@dont-email.me> On 11/04/2025 01:29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > That’s a key point of my proof: if it converges, then the number is > already in the list. No, it isn't. It differs in the nth digit from the nth number in the list. If it doesn't, it isn't the Cantor diagonal. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within