Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vtah2b$10ppe$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Note - Archeological Evidence Pointing More To Ice-Age Super-Civs
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:41:01 -0700
Organization: Pseudochaotic
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <vtah2b$10ppe$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4YqdnciXk-9eM2X6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vtaclj$t8gp$1@dont-email.me> <slrnvvhf3n.3j6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:41:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5a9b14d2bccfc599bc7f74cf27e55589";
	logging-data="1074990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ywgUoi7NYA1aGa5yY3Tqmd05h/X1jzd0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:E1jt7DCH/5HIfjkmEYx5ff8qMkA=
In-Reply-To: <slrnvvhf3n.3j6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
Bytes: 3197

On 10/4/25 23:53, Borax Man wrote:
> I think part of our modern day assumption, that humans back then were
> not as sophisticated as they actually were, was due to us looking for
> evidence for civilisation where we thought we would find it.  Like
> looking for your keys under the street lamp, not because that is where
> they last where, because that is where the light was best.  Sea levels
> have changed, but it was always easier to excavate on land, where we
> found previous artefacts and evidence.
>
> Not much survives of the past, and our understanding is based on what we
> have been able to uncover, which I think is a fraction of what existed.
> Take for example the antikythera mechanism.  There must have been more
> than one, or at least, there must have been precursors, a technological
> arc that leads to that.  We just haven't found it.
>
> But then, look today.  You'll see iPhones and sleek Apple laptops.  Its
> very, very difficult to stumble across older computers now.  How many
> Millennial's have seen a 1980s microcomputer?  Probably only in a
> museum.  These were ubiquitous, and now you can go years without seeing
> one.  If they disappear within a couple of decades, surely decades of
> civilisation, and centuries after that would have erased so, so much.
> Only stone remains.  We see stone and assume that's all there was.
> Books is another.  Public libraries in the suburbs have few old books.
>
> Methods of social organisation, if not written down AND uncovered, would
> also be lost.
>
> I think our view of history is therefore way off, because we've
> constructed our view based on what survived, which perhaps, isn't enough
> to go on after all.

I am waiting for fossil teeth with root canals.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed