Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vtah2b$10ppe$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc Subject: Re: Note - Archeological Evidence Pointing More To Ice-Age Super-Civs Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:41:01 -0700 Organization: Pseudochaotic Lines: 38 Message-ID: <vtah2b$10ppe$1@dont-email.me> References: <4YqdnciXk-9eM2X6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vtaclj$t8gp$1@dont-email.me> <slrnvvhf3n.3j6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:41:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5a9b14d2bccfc599bc7f74cf27e55589"; logging-data="1074990"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ywgUoi7NYA1aGa5yY3Tqmd05h/X1jzd0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:E1jt7DCH/5HIfjkmEYx5ff8qMkA= In-Reply-To: <slrnvvhf3n.3j6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> Bytes: 3197 On 10/4/25 23:53, Borax Man wrote: > I think part of our modern day assumption, that humans back then were > not as sophisticated as they actually were, was due to us looking for > evidence for civilisation where we thought we would find it. Like > looking for your keys under the street lamp, not because that is where > they last where, because that is where the light was best. Sea levels > have changed, but it was always easier to excavate on land, where we > found previous artefacts and evidence. > > Not much survives of the past, and our understanding is based on what we > have been able to uncover, which I think is a fraction of what existed. > Take for example the antikythera mechanism. There must have been more > than one, or at least, there must have been precursors, a technological > arc that leads to that. We just haven't found it. > > But then, look today. You'll see iPhones and sleek Apple laptops. Its > very, very difficult to stumble across older computers now. How many > Millennial's have seen a 1980s microcomputer? Probably only in a > museum. These were ubiquitous, and now you can go years without seeing > one. If they disappear within a couple of decades, surely decades of > civilisation, and centuries after that would have erased so, so much. > Only stone remains. We see stone and assume that's all there was. > Books is another. Public libraries in the suburbs have few old books. > > Methods of social organisation, if not written down AND uncovered, would > also be lost. > > I think our view of history is therefore way off, because we've > constructed our view based on what survived, which perhaps, isn't enough > to go on after all. I am waiting for fossil teeth with root canals. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed