Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vte4po$tdvn$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com>
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
Subject: Re: Got lucky at the drive thru
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:36:08 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vte4po$tdvn$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vt6mbe$1djj0$1@dont-email.me>
 <5efa06dfbebc8e24864c8cd9a6b0bcc5@www.novabbs.org>
 <849fe8a0e379677bce1924d297a36754@www.novabbs.org>
 <2e8cf422bd21c446a6d676dad72b7c77@www.novabbs.org>
 <vta9ik$q5br$2@dont-email.me> <vtactl$tg7o$1@dont-email.me>
 <e4734916828c5a736a0cc342c5c02b29@www.novabbs.org>
 <vtartb$1bp8l$1@dont-email.me>
 <c0c3da9b0944045d062cd352a0b1f4dd@www.novabbs.org>
 <vtbnjv$2ar9b$1@dont-email.me> <vtc2bh$2lmvb$1@dont-email.me>
 <mLgKP.1774778$OrR5.66239@fx18.iad> <vtd9fb$2hf0$1@dont-email.me>
 <lCuKP.2146799$_N6e.21096@fx17.iad> <m5vb48F6q7gU1@mid.individual.net>
 <67fa7d76$8$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Reply-To: hamilton@invalid.com
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 18:36:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d46e179afedcd3e4aa869419e266915b";
	logging-data="964599"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BOhb/hJPKp9lBu1++LHByYonFkl5TEQc="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+U7ivZ968m2jv6Y1xyl6LybDhow=
Bytes: 2218

On 2025-04-12, Mike Duffy <mxduffy@bell.net> wrote:
> On 2025-04-12, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
>
>> Occasionally I will find out that a film was a
>> remake after I've already watched it.  In such
>> a case I usually side with the remake.  Unfortunately,
>> I can't think of any examples right now.
>
> This was my experience with "Day of the Triffids".

The 1963 film, the 1981 BBC series, or the 2009 BBC series?

I suppose we can't count the 1963 film, which was simply a film
version of the novel.

(Ok, I liked the 2001-2003 remake of the Lord of the Rings better
than the 1978 Ralph Bakshi animation.  I had forgotten about Bakshi.)

-- 
Cindy Hamilton