Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vthfkf$3skck$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++
 program to C++, part 2
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:59:26 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vthfkf$3skck$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vt3vje$2uq60$4@dont-email.me> <vt570a$4np7$3@dont-email.me>
 <vt6itt$1as70$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtanrh$188gk$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtbeaj$1tgjn$1@dont-email.me> <vtbv5d$2itvk$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cf6a3de8e8a4c1b1502cb9b34263cb82";
	logging-data="4084116"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eOkmC1juE5f+294ATztnV8cegcL4iISE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JuJO04DJrGY/g3WGBWjyBKRViB8=
In-Reply-To: <vtbv5d$2itvk$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2540

On 4/11/2025 3:47 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
> On 4/11/2025 11:00 AM, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:37:17 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>
>>> Am 09.04.2025 um 21:48 schrieb Lynn McGuire:
>>>
>>>> No, we want to get away from compiling and linking directly.
>>>> That is what we use with Open Watcom F77 and C++.
>>>
>>> The Watcom stuff is totally outdated.
>>> Is there no way to get something newer ?
>>
>> You must be new here in c.l.f.  Lynn has been converting
>> his 700 KLOC of Fortran to C++ for 2+ decades.  It seems
>> his code, which clearly isn't Fortran, can only be compiled
>> by a Watcom language compiler.  For those playing along,
>> that's roughy converting 140 lines of code per workday
>> with 2 weeks for good behavior (ie., 700000 / (50*5*20)).
> 
> Don't forget maintenance (bug fixing) and user needed new features that 
> require about 60 to 70% of our time.
> 
> Lynn

And don't forget that we spent a lot of time updating the code by 
converting all of the Hollerith characters to character strings.  And 
adding "IMPLICIT NONE" to all of the subroutines requiring the explicit 
typing of all of the variables (maybe 10% were typed before due to 
extensive usage of implicit typing rules).

Lynn