| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtidkf$phv3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 09:31:26 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <vtidkf$phv3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1rakhfg.vqrsfd2xnf4mN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <8309cf9411b3d1fb6990a61dbcac02b9@www.novabbs.com> <m5rn1nFj157U5@mid.individual.net> <1ramdrp.6j8jyps41hq0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <vtblj2$28dbm$1@dont-email.me> <m5unm2F36ttU6@mid.individual.net> <m616brFfdkbU4@mid.individual.net> <m63fctFqo98U2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 09:31:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="84228c0f58607340365fba79f539c4d2";
logging-data="837603"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eEr01bm5Cy5uNEogGNAfd2iW6la/qy5E="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:07NM+YMbJqp4imjyF+78hyZbrbA=
Bytes: 4000
On 2025-04-14 03:58:05 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
> Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
>> On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
>>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
>>>>> physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
>>>>> engineers do.
>>>>>
>>>>> To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') sounds
>>>>> like a synonym for 'sex'.
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your area of
>>>> interest?..
>>>
>>> Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
>>>
>>> But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
>>> grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
>>>
>>> Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I
>>> could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
>>>
>>> About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
>>>
>>> Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
>>> them up.
>>>
>>>
>>> Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
>>>
>>> Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
>>> that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
>>>
>>> The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
>>> mistakes, but another explanation is required.
>>>
>>> This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which
>>> the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
>>>
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>> Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.
>
> Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no
> 'language barrier'.
>
>>
>> Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
>> Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
>> coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
>> theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.
>
> Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist.
>
> But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26.
Forget your sex obsession: "black body" was an established term long
before 1905. Newton wrote "Do not black Bodies conceive heat more
easily from Light than those of other Colours do, by reason that the
Light falling on them is not reflected outwards, but enters into the
Bodies, and is often reflected and refracted within them, until it be
stifled and lost?"
--
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots