Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vtiuru$16vsf$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Kempner series
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:25:33 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vtiuru$16vsf$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vt3opc$2m750$1@dont-email.me>
 <08b0c3b7e3c8a8faaf72785e0d4ce0b066e2f4f6@i2pn2.org>
 <vtgm0e$36q6u$2@dont-email.me>
 <e4dc5d311f23fbb2cdf438d6d1fe2ba3243b0ca3@i2pn2.org>
 <vtisud$16dgt$1@dont-email.me>
 <f5efe165ff166bed3002d09ab7fa830ff5747348@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:25:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b4fafcaf6703760557e2d004aa35e1a";
	logging-data="1277839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kBJn4XenhEINbs1Tvbg3MZTRauHjUOxw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tRwPfaPgkBhqQdUlTfy2VYzSrwk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <f5efe165ff166bed3002d09ab7fa830ff5747348@i2pn2.org>

On 14.04.2025 14:20, joes wrote:
> Am Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:52:44 +0200 schrieb WM:

>> All definable sequences of digits are finite. It wouldn't be
>> possible to define infinitely many numbers individually.
> I think it’s possible to define an infinite number sequence, like the
> decimal expansion of e.

It is not possible to define all digits. The formula provides the digit 
at given place , but most n are dark ad therefore cannot be give.

>>>> Wrong. The denominators of the harmonic sequence are finite numbers
>>>> but the diverging part consists of numbers which are larger than all
>>>> definable numbers.
>>> Sounds pretty infinite to me.
>> None is infinite. If you cannot comprehend the meaning of "definable",
>> then first try "defined". There are only finitely many numbers defined.
> That is wrong already. The set N is infinite.
> 
>> Since this remains so forever, there are also only finitely many numbers
>> definable.
> Does not follow if you have infinite time.

There is no actually infinite time. Every second belongs to a finite time.

Regards, WM
>