| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtl7vr$3cbfl$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Willilam =?iso-8859-1?q?Guti=E9rrez?= Xian <riii@mmaajlzt.es>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: Muon paradox
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:13:31 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vtl7vr$3cbfl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <d74079263e98ec581c4ccbdab5c5fa65@www.novabbs.com>
<vsh92t$3mltr$1@dont-email.me> <vt97l2$3n9l0$1@tor.dont-email.me>
<9sWdnW3IQO1JBGH6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
<vtiebm$pp07$1@dont-email.me>
<1rasshx.151cvyvke403cN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:13:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba34c3561ae458a575a8f89ecd3d3c1c";
logging-data="3550709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LiqbWPUS9+IDG573PqKoJFaS0YUyZWyU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zjGq7V0A6B4hLk/341865g1ox9s=
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEWimK7q17hI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X-Face: $[(tK_O>d3`L;K.>eTA;y"P>{?Z"oFiUjv%1PV{dN|unv$!)_Ld_3IYxi\`30ui:
BcQ+R}|eO4dLQ.dB}j`nsbZC{mT+EycP9jRR4Pg>bR&t,-^e!{'%GPDd(@|aD0Sq=sjCSoo
1lG!?Qnq^;5~4W=cyQdSR7P3P>%\F\,)Xe]E~W-&qJg=7(m4#iq;gW2S*hu.Ni"FIA#mlkf
!'4mV;lA>aJxUNHpglBoQtN\zA*Mv'Chd'frFeFjN.(Kr}"<OUKyeXBhK>51viU4rK6Ckhe Ls
Bytes: 3467
J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> > Bailey et al, Phys. Lett. B 55 (1975) 420-424
>>
>> this is blatantly incorrectuous. They never know how many muons are
>> there, due quantum probability distribution. So your assumed energy
>> makes no sense. Not even for detection.
>
> Au contraire, it is you who are 'blatantly incorrectuous', [sic]
> and you obviously have no idea of what you are talking about.
> It is easy to measure how many muons there are in the storage ring at
> any given moment, by picking up their electromagnetic fields, Jan
au contraire yourself, which also reveals you dont capisce how phisics are
done in laboratories. If you think those particles are immune for quantum
probability distribution, you are fooling yourself. Also, once you tap
that electromagnetic field, that's already invasive, so essentially
destroy that particle.
learn advanced physics, me friendo..