Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vtm51c$607j$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: rec tech mower Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:29:16 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <vtm51c$607j$3@dont-email.me> References: <vtbuvt$2iia8$1@dont-email.me> <vtc70h$2qaqs$2@dont-email.me> <mqajvjhn7rg7rorr77pd4t79a6b5iio1dj@4ax.com> <vtcap4$2u9vc$1@dont-email.me> <6ubjvj9j6ipv60svn0sup8ks45ha9nluj1@4ax.com> <byaLP.2585362$TBhc.1497141@fx16.iad> <gjhqvjl1cjldhvvcub1nj4lq2f0t26jgkr@4ax.com> <vtkhes$2pmgv$1@dont-email.me> <vtlk1r$3naqm$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 19:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="801b11adb2d430a9561b44b224e001ea"; logging-data="196851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193iP80xcFDDnaWiBXj0xDJneMpu9vU4+M=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:llRfZo+bLN3ZyPFyqAwxAFljl0Q= In-Reply-To: <vtlk1r$3naqm$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3640 On 4/15/2025 8:39 AM, AMuzi wrote: > On 4/14/2025 9:48 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> On 4/14/2025 1:58 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >>> >>> For a while, there were attempts to meet California CARB requirements >>> for lawn equipment: >>> <https://www.lawnstarter.com/blog/lawn-care-2/faq- california-green- >>> lawn-care-law/> >>> The 2 cycle engines were too dirty to pass the requirements. 4 cycle >>> would pass, but needed computer controlled ignition and possibly fuel >>> injection. They've been largely replaced by battery powered lawn care >>> equipment. >> For many years, my mower has been an old 4 stroke Lawn Boy that I >> inherited. It's self propelled, but the walk-behind speed is not fast >> enough enough for me, and I hate the noise. >> >> I've generally solved the problem by hiring teenagers to cut my lawn. >> But the last available one, who's done it the past few years has >> graduated college. I'm afraid I'm going to have to do the mowing myself. >> >> I'd love to have an electric mower, largely because they are so quiet >> and can be stored very compactly in my overcrowded garage. But our lot >> is about 0.6 acres, with tons of creative landcaping (by my wife) that >> is beautiful, but requires detailed mowing. For a few years I was half >> owner of a riding mower but I sold it. It was very inappropriate due >> to the large number of obstacles. It took almost as long as a walk >> behind mower. >> >> Again, I'd love an electric mower, but I'm not aware of one with >> sufficient run time to do this lawn. Also, I've read some complaints >> that the (rather expensive) batteries last only a few years (like 3 >> years in some cases) before needing replacement. >> >> Advice is welcome, especially from those who actually have first hand >> knowledge. >> > > I'm not an expert but there were or are corded electrics as I knew > someone who loved his. Assuming your house is roughly centered on the > lot a 100ft cord would do. I know those exist, but there's no way it would work. I just counted, and there are at least 13 "islands" of landscaping, large trees or other obstacles I have to cut around. They'd require far too much backtracking, etc. if I were dragging a cord. -- - Frank Krygowski