Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:28:44 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <vtmfhr$g5ha$1@dont-email.me>
References: <87a58um184.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net>
 <m5f1c7FhdikU1@mid.individual.net>
 <87ecy43qdh.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> <vt0thv$3vi0o$9@dont-email.me>
 <87semjl99f.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> <vt2qni$1u1ta$2@dont-email.me>
 <87a58il0jo.fsf@mothra.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> <vtl5ad$363i1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtll27$3naqm$4@dont-email.me> <vtm47o$607j$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtm4hj$5eo3$1@dont-email.me> <r1atvjpsq27ggcsuah5a8uarm8fp7kubt2@4ax.com>
 <vtm9qh$b478$1@dont-email.me> <qpftvj9g5cjod16sq49fer69n278ctmutd@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:28:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed7addb222d7ffef13c3c1e5cd56bbf6";
	logging-data="529962"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+RT8NK0RvalWsmeLutuWxa"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gNvs6o5F4mabKAJfUkdOnK2EXLM=
In-Reply-To: <qpftvj9g5cjod16sq49fer69n278ctmutd@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3554

On 4/15/2025 3:24 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:50:57 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/15/2025 1:46 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:20:51 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/15/2025 12:15 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>>>> On 4/15/2025 8:56 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But here, the rise in anti-vax was driven by upper class
>>>>>> suburban mothers and Hollywood celebrities who skew soft
>>>>>> left.  (as with any social phenomenon there are of course
>>>>>> many flavors of opinion and politics)  It was unusual
>>>>>> before that quack Wakefield (1998?) but snowballed after
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The anti-vax movement was driven by ignorant anti-
>>>>> scientists. Yes, it's bounced around the political spectrum,
>>>>> but the often deliberate ignorance has been and remains
>>>>> constant.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I agree with that.  Wasn't helped by deliberate lies
>>>> and not only by Wakefield.
>>>
>>> I submitted to two doses of the Covid "vaccine," and then I realised
>>> that the jackass who was directing it (Fauci) and all the other scams
>>> (masks and six foot spaces) was partially responsible for creating
>>> Covid.
>>>
>>> --
>>> C'est bon
>>> Soloman
>>
>>
>> Note dates of these items
>>
>> https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18787
>>
>> https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21487
> 
> 
> "Editors’ note, March 2020 We are aware that this story is being used
> as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus
> causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is
> true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of
> the coronavirus."
> 
> What scientists believed that then?  What scientists believe that
> today?
> 
> --
> C'est bon
> Soloman

OK, so either the original report is wrong or the editor's 
note five years later is wrong. You decide.

-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971