Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vtms6u$rm65$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:04:44 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vtms6u$rm65$1@dont-email.me>
References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vsj1m8$1f8h2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsj2l9$1j0as$1@dont-email.me> <vsjef3$1u4nk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsjg6t$20pdb$1@dont-email.me> <vsjgjn$1v1n4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsjk4k$24q5m$1@dont-email.me> <vsjlcp$230a5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsni1v$291i3$5@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvv82gk.2aciv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <vt1a7f$i5jd$1@dont-email.me> <vti36r$g4nu$2@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvvqhmc.2eh69.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <vtjknt$1sp26$1@dont-email.me> <vtk2f9$295ku$2@dont-email.me>
 <87cyde2vyf.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vtk6es$2cj23$3@dont-email.me>
 <vtkjj6$2qmnt$1@dont-email.me> <vtkm8o$2u0tr$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtlp5v$3nrio$1@dont-email.me> <87tt6p11bw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:04:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b6faaa98249fc010cb8dd91bd9407f0d";
	logging-data="907461"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OL+wqx8ybt35PSebRd+YUfIfCXH0NX5I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GUdQzzRMthLgid+ZZjCjQkiW1/A=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <87tt6p11bw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
Bytes: 3180

On 4/15/2025 3:56 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> [...]
>> The point is, the uncertainty in the date of his birth, whether
>> fictional or real, is far less than the 59 million year uncertainty in
>> the date of the Big Bang. In order for it to be comparably uncertain, we
>> would have to be unsure whether he was incarnated in the Mesozoic or
>> Cenozoic eras.
> [...]
> 
> None of that is relevant.
> 
> The uncertainty in the timing of the Big Bang and the birth of Christ
> are relevant to cosmologists, historians, and religious scholars, not
> to programmers who don't happen to be working in any of those fields.

The strange part is that some people think that Jesus just might be a 
hyper interesting experiment, whatever... Perhaps Mary got abducted by 
something from another world, dimension, ect... Shit happens. Or some 
shit like that crap. I just don't know. Perhaps his divine powers were 
real, as part of said experiment?



> 
> The uncertainty in the timing of January 1, 1970, where 1970 is a
> year number in the current almost universally accepted Gregorian
> calendar, is essentially zero.  Same for any other less commonly
> used chosen epoch.  The fact that the number 1970 is arbitrary
> is not a problem for software.  In fact it's an advantage, since
> there's no uncertainty in the presence of any new information.
>