| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtms6u$rm65$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:04:44 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <vtms6u$rm65$1@dont-email.me> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vsj1m8$1f8h2$1@dont-email.me> <vsj2l9$1j0as$1@dont-email.me> <vsjef3$1u4nk$1@dont-email.me> <vsjg6t$20pdb$1@dont-email.me> <vsjgjn$1v1n4$1@dont-email.me> <vsjk4k$24q5m$1@dont-email.me> <vsjlcp$230a5$1@dont-email.me> <vsni1v$291i3$5@dont-email.me> <slrnvv82gk.2aciv.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vt1a7f$i5jd$1@dont-email.me> <vti36r$g4nu$2@dont-email.me> <slrnvvqhmc.2eh69.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <vtjknt$1sp26$1@dont-email.me> <vtk2f9$295ku$2@dont-email.me> <87cyde2vyf.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vtk6es$2cj23$3@dont-email.me> <vtkjj6$2qmnt$1@dont-email.me> <vtkm8o$2u0tr$1@dont-email.me> <vtlp5v$3nrio$1@dont-email.me> <87tt6p11bw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 02:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b6faaa98249fc010cb8dd91bd9407f0d"; logging-data="907461"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OL+wqx8ybt35PSebRd+YUfIfCXH0NX5I=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:GUdQzzRMthLgid+ZZjCjQkiW1/A= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87tt6p11bw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> Bytes: 3180 On 4/15/2025 3:56 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > [...] >> The point is, the uncertainty in the date of his birth, whether >> fictional or real, is far less than the 59 million year uncertainty in >> the date of the Big Bang. In order for it to be comparably uncertain, we >> would have to be unsure whether he was incarnated in the Mesozoic or >> Cenozoic eras. > [...] > > None of that is relevant. > > The uncertainty in the timing of the Big Bang and the birth of Christ > are relevant to cosmologists, historians, and religious scholars, not > to programmers who don't happen to be working in any of those fields. The strange part is that some people think that Jesus just might be a hyper interesting experiment, whatever... Perhaps Mary got abducted by something from another world, dimension, ect... Shit happens. Or some shit like that crap. I just don't know. Perhaps his divine powers were real, as part of said experiment? > > The uncertainty in the timing of January 1, 1970, where 1970 is a > year number in the current almost universally accepted Gregorian > calendar, is essentially zero. Same for any other less commonly > used chosen epoch. The fact that the number 1970 is arbitrary > is not a problem for software. In fact it's an advantage, since > there's no uncertainty in the presence of any new information. >