| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtn815$19pod$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:26:28 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <vtn815$19pod$1@dont-email.me> References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vthqtc$5g2e$2@dont-email.me> <63af93cb608258cc3e12b9bab3a2efa0b7ee7eee@i2pn2.org> <vtit6a$15e5s$3@dont-email.me> <vtivmo$19aqd$1@dont-email.me> <vtkc4l$2h48g$3@dont-email.me> <vtkdnm$2iqu5$1@dont-email.me> <vtkkge$2si58$2@dont-email.me> <vtl56j$3aajg$1@dont-email.me> <vtlu0a$3vgp0$1@dont-email.me> <vtm04f$2a90$1@dont-email.me> <vtm9q8$aut7$1@dont-email.me> <vtmah8$2a90$2@dont-email.me> <vtmgen$gs48$1@dont-email.me> <vtmhdr$sce$1@news.muc.de> <vtmu6g$t2fj$1@dont-email.me> <vtmvkc$s2m5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 05:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b4b330ce33628c856404e1363700a09"; logging-data="1369869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Z6Y3liVvUSyqlZ8h0an71" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:H/sMOA8qlv4iMJGw2FJUkr0L3EU= Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250415-10, 4/15/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <vtmvkc$s2m5$1@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean On 4/15/2025 8:03 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 16/04/2025 01:38, olcott wrote: >> It is moronic that people insist on ignoring >> the pathological relationship that DD specifies that changes the >> behavior of DD to make this behavior DIFFERENT THAN THE BEHAVIOR >> OF THE DIRECT EXECUTION !!! > > It doesn't matter. It only matters whether it gets the answer right, > which it can't (if you are correctly modelling the problem correctly) > because the Halting Problem is essentially a trick problem for which > there's /no/ right answer. "A strange game", as Joshua said. "The only > winning move is not to play." > > One other point - the people you're talking to are /not/ morons. They > are intelligent, educated people who are doing their best to help you > around your evident misunderstanding of the Halting Problem. You may > believe them to be mistaken, but to continue to treat them with disdain > is not the best way to retain your audience and suggests to the world at > large that you're a lightweight who never outgrew adolescence. > > Please, for your own sake, try growing up. Learn to treat your > interlocutors with a little common decency, and think about what they're > telling you. Truth is not a democracy, but when a lot of very smart > people tell you you're wrong and /no/body has come on board, it's time > to think long and hard about your position. > YOU ALL ARE ALL VERY STUPIDLY VERY WRONG *corresponding output to the input* *corresponding output to the input* *corresponding output to the input* *corresponding output to the input* *corresponding output to the input* -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer