Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vtn815$19pod$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:26:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vtn815$19pod$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vthqtc$5g2e$2@dont-email.me>
 <63af93cb608258cc3e12b9bab3a2efa0b7ee7eee@i2pn2.org>
 <vtit6a$15e5s$3@dont-email.me> <vtivmo$19aqd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtkc4l$2h48g$3@dont-email.me> <vtkdnm$2iqu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtkkge$2si58$2@dont-email.me> <vtl56j$3aajg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtlu0a$3vgp0$1@dont-email.me> <vtm04f$2a90$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtm9q8$aut7$1@dont-email.me> <vtmah8$2a90$2@dont-email.me>
 <vtmgen$gs48$1@dont-email.me> <vtmhdr$sce$1@news.muc.de>
 <vtmu6g$t2fj$1@dont-email.me> <vtmvkc$s2m5$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 05:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b4b330ce33628c856404e1363700a09";
	logging-data="1369869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Z6Y3liVvUSyqlZ8h0an71"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:H/sMOA8qlv4iMJGw2FJUkr0L3EU=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250415-10, 4/15/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vtmvkc$s2m5$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

On 4/15/2025 8:03 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 16/04/2025 01:38, olcott wrote:
>> It is moronic that people insist on ignoring
>> the pathological relationship that DD specifies that changes the
>> behavior of DD to make this behavior DIFFERENT THAN THE BEHAVIOR
>> OF THE DIRECT EXECUTION !!!
> 
> It doesn't matter. It only matters whether it gets the answer right, 
> which it can't (if you are correctly modelling the problem correctly) 
> because the Halting Problem is essentially a trick problem for which 
> there's /no/ right answer. "A strange game", as Joshua said. "The only 
> winning move is not to play."
> 
> One other point - the people you're talking to are /not/ morons. They 
> are intelligent, educated people who are doing their best to help you 
> around your evident misunderstanding of the Halting Problem. You may 
> believe them to be mistaken, but to continue to treat them with disdain 
> is not the best way to retain your audience and suggests to the world at 
> large that you're a lightweight who never outgrew adolescence.
> 
> Please, for your own sake, try growing up. Learn to treat your 
> interlocutors with a little common decency, and think about what they're 
> telling you. Truth is not a democracy, but when a lot of very smart 
> people tell you you're wrong and /no/body has come on board, it's time 
> to think long and hard about your position.
> 

YOU ALL ARE ALL VERY STUPIDLY VERY WRONG
*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*
*corresponding output to the input*

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer