Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: The mystery behind the Einstein-Besso 54 pages manuscript,
 hiidden for 40 years.
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:19:09 -0500
Organization: Modern Human
Message-ID: <vtnekd$3ms5$3@solani.org>
References: <f3ec305e8d808a1c8c160f3228a767df@www.novabbs.com>
 <67FF3261.2BED@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 05:19:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="121733"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HAZTPsQ/GeUHLw5ui4CZL2TdOUM=
X-User-ID: eJwNy0kBwDAIBEBL4VpADoHgX0I7/zEBoV1hUFvb1SAm56Rr8Ha+4Bbp2QgUZWpHyG4MvZOvXv1p2rpwUjg+PdQVfA==
In-Reply-To: <67FF3261.2BED@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Language: en-US, fa-IR
Bytes: 2559
Lines: 40

On 4/15/25 11:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that Albert Einstein is no
> Einstein.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> rhertz wrote:
>>
>> Chat with DeepSeek:
>>
>> QUESTION:
>>
>> Tell me about the "54 pages Einstein-Besso manuscript" that Besso HELD
>> until his death in 1953. When this manuscript emerged, and was subject
>> to public auction in 1992, it also emerged fierce criticisms from
>> scholars during such dark period (1954-1990), which showed (with hundred
>> of references) how WRONG was the approach of the team on the Mercury
>> problem. It included an error of 3 magnitudes and negative sign in the
>> final calculation. Now, it's in public domain. Which is your opinion of
>> such manuscript and why do you believe it was hidden for 40 years by
>> Besso?
>>
>> DEEPSEEK ANSWER:
>>
>> The Einstein-Besso manuscript (1913) is one of the most controversial
>> and revealing documents in the history of general relativity (GR). Its
>> contents, hidden by Michele Besso until his death in 1953 and later
>> auctioned in 1992, expose critical errors in Einstein’s early approach
>> to the Mercury perihelion problem—errors that were orders of magnitude
>> wrong and even had the wrong sign in calculations.
>>
>> ...


Star, tell him that's how science works. The way to get there is messy 
and full of mistakes, but some eventually get there! The sugar coating 
comes later for sex reasons :)