Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Americans: that clueless cretin you elected just killed the CVE program :-(
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:57:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vtqtsl$lmr6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vto74r$25guk$1@dont-email.me> <vtont7$2lh18$1@dont-email.me> <vtor4t$2o3nk$1@dont-email.me> <67fff46b$0$710$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:57:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="996a99b5b318476d1932001273ebe5ab";
	logging-data="711526"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jZsdYK5Y37wGPH5gOIBnBmGplv6Qoijk="
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lQGGB4BC/nfNC8FyyU3gDUHvta8=
Bytes: 2688

On 2025-04-16, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On 4/16/2025 1:58 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>> On 2025-04-16, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>>> On 4/16/2025 8:17 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>>>> Of course, now that I have called him a clueless cretin in public means
>>>> I am now unlikely to be allowed into the US (_if_ I ever wanted to go now).
>>>
>>> I would hope that they have better criteria than whether you like Trump
>>> or not.
>> 
>> I'm afraid not. :-(
>> 
>> https://www.politico.eu/article/france-academic-denied-entry-united-states-donald-trump-personal-opinion-messages/
>
> Note that there are 3 different explanations floating around.
>
> "he expressed a personal opinion on the research policy pursued by the
> Trump administration"
>
> "He was accused of sending messages that ?expressed hatred towards Trump 
> and can be qualified as terrorism,?"
>
> "The French researcher in question was in possession of confidential 
> information on his electronic device from Los Alamos National 
> Laboratory? in violation of a non-disclosure agreement"
>

In the third option above, why wasn't he immediately arrested and
then charged with a serious criminal offence ? Why did they just
let him go if he was in possession of confidential information
from a highly classified US laboratory ?

That third "option" just does not make sense, at least how it has
been described.

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.