| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtrcbb$3doi$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: For the adults - Why can't Arlen apologize when he is proven wrong? Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:04:43 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 52 Message-ID: <vtrcbb$3doi$1@dont-email.me> References: <vtr3qa$1gq7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vtr9j9$5lko$1@solani.org> <nJacnT8xVOtPsJz1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@supernews.com> <xn0p4np0h59te6000@reader443.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c5354d8e131467b7aaa3bc68a03803e"; logging-data="112402"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18N2Tu6WRSxBSkNILTCVVMw5IIwCSZSVUc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:1B7k3XBi2j2xaorkheVHH+3xnxA= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <xn0p4np0h59te6000@reader443.eternal-september.org> Bytes: 3184 On 2025-04-17 09:51, badgolferman wrote: > Tyrone wrote: > >> On Apr 17, 2025 at 12:17:45 PM EDT, "badgolferman" >> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote: >>>> Currently there is a disagreement between me and the Apple >>>> trolls. >>>> Boiling it down to the essentials, the Apple trolls insist that >>>> iOS is magical in that it can bind to privileged ports (somehow >>>> magically so). >>>> While that would be nice, my view is more pragmatic in that my >>>> understanding of iOS is that an SMB server can not bind to those >>>> ports. >>>> The beauty of this discussion, for the purpose of determining >>>> whether the Apple trolls have the capacity to admit when they're >>>> wrong and apologize... >>>> Is that it's a binary issue. >>>> a. Either the Apple trolls are correct >>>> b. Or, the Apple trolls are wrong >>>> >>>> Time will tell, but what do you predict the Apple trolls will do >>>> if they're found to be either right or wrong on this binary >>>> question of fact? >>>> Will they apologize? >>>> Or not? >>>> >>> >>> I’m not sure if this is helpful or harmful…. >>> >>> https://support.apple.com/en-us/103229 >> >> While that is interesting, it does not even matter at this point. >> Arlen is already proven wrong, by 3 sources. Myself, Jolly Roger and >> the app in question. The SMB Server on iOS DOES use port 445. >> >> But as usual, he can't accept it and will never apologize for being >> such a dipshit. > > > I'm not discounting your earlier screenshot, but how do you know the > program isn't intercepting incoming traffic at Port 445 and forwarding > it to another port? Without a network scanner that would be hard to > tell. Because, you simpleton: If a program can "intercept" traffic on a port, then it must be LISTENING on that port in the first place. Hence there would be no NEED to forward the traffic to another port.