| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtsd31$1t9s9$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:23:27 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <vtsd31$1t9s9$6@dont-email.me> References: <vtl5ad$363i1$1@dont-email.me> <vtll27$3naqm$4@dont-email.me> <vtm47o$607j$1@dont-email.me> <vtm4hj$5eo3$1@dont-email.me> <r1atvjpsq27ggcsuah5a8uarm8fp7kubt2@4ax.com> <cm2uvjl62opgljgantc261r9vq2l4iuth4@4ax.com> <vto8kg$27757$1@dont-email.me> <1qbvvjlicmocd7rl859vlve22h6galrndg@4ax.com> <kahvvj5d4moisd4pn6kmebidv70nuaocfm@4ax.com> <1jn00kl03kddk8rkhr3bnpabv7u5i9sout@4ax.com> <fee10kd59cfctksurnlaiabgskn8hi7r7f@4ax.com> <vtqspg$l1gd$2@dont-email.me> <srt10k1fs3lqacj0tirgcm9p1ljkqep4p7@4ax.com> <vtrto8$1g01o$1@dont-email.me> <vts7bt$1ojor$1@dont-email.me> <vts8vv$1r8dg$2@dont-email.me> <vtsbpd$1t9s9$2@dont-email.me> <vtsc64$1tvda$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 04:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5572f89ae9dfbf383d66442eaeb2563a"; logging-data="2008969"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Gr70RozRXE+mDoPsnphGVLlj4xRUBHQc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:5wXomdY1B6fdfqKKAITkBE35HBc= In-Reply-To: <vtsc64$1tvda$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 4/17/2025 10:08 PM, AMuzi wrote: > On 4/17/2025 9:01 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> >> Oh, and "speech" in the form of millionaire or corporate campaign >> contributions is an abomination. > > How so? > If I have an individual right to free speech (and I absolutely do), then > why may my right be curtailed when I join with others of like mind? > > It's a long standing feature of common law (well before USA) that > corporations are fictitious persons, entitled to rights of their > composite individuals when they act as one. Common law or not, I think the idea of a corporation being a "person" is nuts. But even if one accepts their "personhood," they should be limited to the amount of speech that _one_ person can produce. And "speech" measured in dollars is an abomination. -- - Frank Krygowski