| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vtum59$83f$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!dannyb From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Zuckerberg gets hung out to dry by whistle-blower Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 23:10:33 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <vtum59$83f$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <vtufa6$3gf8q$2@dont-email.me> <vtuge2$3sl3h$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 23:10:33 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3"; logging-data="8303"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: nn/6.7.3 In <vtuge2$3sl3h$1@dont-email.me> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> writes: [snip] >> Kong AND Taiwan. Senator Blumenthal pointed out that Zuck had told the >> Senate in previous testimony that no such activities took place. She's >> essentially exposed him as lying to the Senate and betraying customers >> in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZzxxLqWKOE [10 minutes] >> >> I'm not sure how he's going to deal with this mess. He's got lots of >> money, power, and influence so he's got lots of levers to pull. If I >> were the whistle-blower, I would keep a VERY low profile, just in case >> Zuck decides that an "unfortunate accident" would be a good idea. >What would be the point in whacking her now? You only whack someone to keep >them from exposing you. She's already spilled the beans. Just like why does a loan shark (per tv and movies..) kill the patsy who owes him $50k and then won't get the money. It's to warn other delinquents... -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]