Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vtvqd0$149h7$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: signalling a condvar from inside vs. signalling a condvar von
 outside
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:29:39 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vtvqd0$149h7$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
References: <vte0g6$pmgv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtef76$16guv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtgloc$36urv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vth3gt$3j0qm$1@dont-email.me>
 <vth5ig$3kqh7$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vthb0p$3p9fh$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtl9ii$3dqu3$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtmapb$bjcc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtnam3$1c6fn$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtpcnt$384n4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtpu86$3qnsh$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtq3dt$3vg77$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtqo57$hi7r$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtrf3u$15mgp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtsph1$2d55o$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtu9un$3mhje$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtub8i$3o27s$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtvq5i$149vk$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:29:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1adf96640df4264f504ff07bfb58ff47";
	logging-data="1189415"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190JZlTmWCR55ET7BHt9TH6rFGB9o+/esA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EGrluhjhJXjfTAwOBksmDIESTPA=
In-Reply-To: <vtvq5i$149vk$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2614

Am 19.04.2025 um 11:25 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

>> But there's one interesting fact to learn at last: broadcasting is more
>> efficient than unicasting.

> Ugggg... Only broadcast when you absolutely have to! Not willy nilly. 
> Argh! Anyway...

That's not true. As you can see from my source I'm broadcasting when
there are more or equal elements than waiting threads. That's much
more efficient.
And I don't wanted to say that broadcasting should be preferred
mostly but I've measured with Windows and Linux that if broadcasting
is eligible in the mentioned way it's more efficient even when there's
only a single waiting threads.
You should have dropped your objection if you first read my source.