Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vtvsq4$172j8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: signalling a condvar from inside vs. signalling a condvar von
 outside
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 03:10:10 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vtvsq4$172j8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vte0g6$pmgv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtef76$16guv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtgloc$36urv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vth3gt$3j0qm$1@dont-email.me>
 <vth5ig$3kqh7$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vthb0p$3p9fh$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtl9ii$3dqu3$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtmapb$bjcc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtnam3$1c6fn$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtpcnt$384n4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtpu86$3qnsh$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtq3dt$3vg77$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtqo57$hi7r$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtrf3u$15mgp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtsph1$2d55o$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtu9un$3mhje$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtub8i$3o27s$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vtvq5i$149vk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtvqd0$149h7$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 12:10:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aef3828e034e8f533cd77d3f4a64e9bf";
	logging-data="1280616"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182sy0XVPLLGeXmpM0506b+RL/Vhqz4hbE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jIxKWWLjmE09KDUIK0dv/Yv1B7c=
In-Reply-To: <vtvqd0$149h7$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2819

On 4/19/2025 2:29 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 19.04.2025 um 11:25 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> 
>>> But there's one interesting fact to learn at last: broadcasting is more
>>> efficient than unicasting.
> 
>> Ugggg... Only broadcast when you absolutely have to! Not willy nilly. 
>> Argh! Anyway...
> 
> That's not true. 

Uggg... A broadcast is a special case. Well, when would you use a 
broadcast vs a single signal? Ugggg...



> As you can see from my source I'm broadcasting when
> there are more or equal elements than waiting threads. That's much
> more efficient.
> And I don't wanted to say that broadcasting should be preferred
> mostly but I've measured with Windows and Linux that if broadcasting
> is eligible in the mentioned way it's more efficient even when there's
> only a single waiting threads.
> You should have dropped your objection if you first read my source.
>