| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vu1ne6$2tm9f$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Doctor Who S15/S2 - Ep2: Lux Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 03:50:45 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 81 Message-ID: <vu1ne6$2tm9f$1@dont-email.me> References: <xn0p4qtqb8i9li1000@post.eweka.nl> <vu0un9$1jdi$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vu165m$2bnct$1@dont-email.me> <vu1fe2$1ng9$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 04:50:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4a939cc3a6e5a8c1051c1763ec35c83a"; logging-data="3070255"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19x1FCUylGss2QPgKZPUSIerz70KLMbpUM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WyPEbPw1a1X1TgzMuWQHCyArqWE= In-Reply-To: <vu1fe2$1ng9$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 5209 On 20/04/2025 01:34, The Doctor wrote: > In article <vu165m$2bnct$1@dont-email.me>, > The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote: >> On 19/04/2025 20:48, The Doctor wrote: >>> In article <xn0p4qtqb8i9li1000@post.eweka.nl>, >>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote: >>>> The second episode of the new season gives us "Lux" which >>>> doesn't just break the fourth wall, it blows it to bits!!! >>>> >>>> There was a lot in "Lux" to like... I thought Mr Ring-a-Ding >>>> was quite a good villain, despite being a cartoon. He also >>>> turns out to be another one of the Chaos Gods... of which I'm >>>> sure we'll hear more of later on in the season. Mr Ring-a-Ding >>>> was something different for "Doctor Who" anyway, so that was a >>>> plus point. The chemistry between Belinda and the Doctor is >>>> another one, as they come across as a fun pairing. I am actually >>>> preferring Belinda to Ruby at this moment in time, her dynamic >>>> with the Doctor seems to be way more interesting. >>>> >>>> Because of the animation in this episode it would be easy to >>>> suggest that without the Disney investment episodes like "Lux" >>>> couldn't have been made, but it is undeniably true that "Doctor >>>> Who" has never looked so good. Visually, episodes are quite >>>> impressive to look at. It's usually the plots or the rushed >>>> endings that let episodes down these days, not what the episodes >>>> look like. >>>> >>>> The middle bit with the "Doctor Who" fans watching the episode >>>> will probably upset some of the more serious types in fandom who >>>> generally don't like how they are portrayed. For me the scene >>>> would have been really cool if it had been three of our RADW >>>> regulars viewing the episode instead though. Imagine if it had >>>> been Daniel70, Dave and Aggy sitting around talking about their >>>> favourite show instead? Okay, an in-joke that only ten people >>>> would have got might be too much to expect, but I think it would >>>> have been fun! Aggy could have coughed "sexual grooming" into >>>> his cup of tea, Dave - in his Tom Baker scarf - could have said >>>> "Retcon the Timeless Child", whilst Daniel70 could have looked >>>> puzzled and asked "is Blink the episode with the trains in the >>>> sky?" - You missed a trick there RTD! :-) >>>> >>>> The Mrs Flood cameo was basically there to tell us that she can >>>> also travel in time, as here she was stalking the Doctor in the >>>> 1950's. So maybe that's a clue that Mrs Flood is a Time Lord? >>>> >>>> Overall the episode, despite being a bit on the weird side, was >>>> actually quite fun. It was almost a historical adventure when >>>> you strip away the 'God of light' stuff. Plus, RTD showed that >>>> he can still be creative in 2025 and he can actually give us >>>> something different when he puts his mind to it. Of course, >>>> being an RTD written episode also means that a lot of plot >>>> detail went AWOL, with a lot of the reasoning behind events >>>> missing. (Probably to all be explained in the season >>>> finale.) However, for me "Lux" was an enjoyable episode to watch >>>> and it is a good step-up from last week's episode. Good but not >>>> great. I'll give it a 7/10. >>> >>> (5+ 0 +5 +7 ) 17/4 -> 4.25 /10 >> >> It's only 0 if there was confirmation in the episode that Doctor Whoke >> was cancelled. Otherwise it's -16. >> >> -- >> The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >> >> "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >> stands for." -William Shatner > > (5 +0 +5 +7 +8) -> 25/5 is 5/10 > > 25-16 -> 9 making it 1.8 . Your decision please? The average score will remain in a state of quantum entablements until an observation is made concerning an announcement of Doctor Whoke's cancellation. -- The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw "To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for." -William Shatner