Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What do Palestinians see on TV?
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:33:39 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <vu6v63$3kfho$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqspve$24vi0$3@dont-email.me> <vu6a23$2vmr8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vu6bam$2vhkd$2@dont-email.me> <vu6cc7$3224i$1@dont-email.me>
 <vu6jer$3815n$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 04:33:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="574674237465061e4d679aecf20ec969";
	logging-data="3817016"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ePBGpKCNFYt6aStTGtLy9UezC7V2b5s4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yxN6RVLa5MVbYmoQlJ/1V/sTyLg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vu6jer$3815n$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4253

On 4/21/2025 7:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2025 at 2:12:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/21/2025 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Apr 21, 2025 at 1:33:06 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 4/21/2025 4:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Apr 21, 2025 at 12:45:13 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 4/21/2025 1:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       On Apr 21, 2025 at 9:54:43 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       On 4/20/2025 8:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         On Apr 20, 2025 at 4:50:30 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>         On 4/20/2025 5:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>           On Apr 20, 2025 at 1:33:31 PM PDT, "moviePig"
>>>>>>>>>>>   <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>           On 4/20/2025 3:38 PM, Rhino wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   And while you're figuring that out, tell me one good reason why
>>>>>>>>>>>>   teachers SHOULDN'T be monitored by audio and video?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Have you ever attempted a difficult task before a thousand inspectors?
>>>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>>>   The police have an even more difficult task than public school teachers
>>>>>>>>>>>   and they're expected to do it before a thousand inspectors.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   More difficult, perhaps, but less subtle and reliant on the spontaneity
>>>>>>>>>>   and empathy that makes a good teacher.
>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>   So?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Good teachers are creative and free to improvise. Cops, not so much.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>   What does that have to do with cameras?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     When the camera's on, a cop will presumably conduct himself with
>>>>>>     increased attention to strictly prescribed cautious behavior. Not the
>>>>>>     same sort of burden we'd like to see teachers carrying.  Imnsho.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     All a teacher has to do is stick to the curriculum and not interject
>>>>>   personal
>>>>>     political opinions or give or elicit commentary on anyone's sexuality and
>>>>>     they'll be fine.
>>>>
>>>>   Yes, an automaton like ChatGPT should fit the bill nicely.
>>>   
>>>   One doesn't have to be an automaton. One only has to not be this:
>>>   
>>>   https://ibb.co/zVrFVctS
>>
>> Well, of course.  Purple hair and a nose ring deserve hard time...
> 
> And the militant gay flag with the hammer & sickle and the BLM poster... which
> you conveniently missed,

How could I miss them?  They've been a running theme...


> but yes, when I was a kid the school had a dress code
> for the kids. There's no reason the teachers shouldn't have to abide by one as
> well.

Well, I had to go back and check to see what outrageous garb she's 
sporting ...and I conclude you must be talking about her hair and ring? 
If so, I can safely say our concerns there are miles apart.  (Fwiw, *I* 
personally deplore both aesthetically, but so what?)