Article <vucs5r$167ao$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vucs5r$167ao$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<vucs5r$167ao$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re:_Refutation_of_Strachey=E2=80=99s_1965_Proof_Based_on_Self-Referential_Conflation_as_a_Category_(Type)_Error?=
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:19:07 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <vucs5r$167ao$1@dont-email.me>
References: <3%oNP.2703666$nb1.805417@fx01.ams4> <130c384bc4881eb654343d0ccf3ced6905a90fbb@i2pn2.org> <3QpNP.1081604$B61.671277@fx02.ams4> <vu7kke$7o3q$1@dont-email.me> <878qnsze8s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:19:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b323bd0b35eb59ebd32e9261de22c1e";
	logging-data="1252696"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+BXceVJvuxDNgt7/Vud1n"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VMtC2bB48oXV/qldoCrVtMfiTxQ=

On 2025-04-22 10:23:31 +0000, Keith Thompson said:

> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> writes:
>> On 2025-04-21 11:18:23 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
> [...]
>>> A circular dependency is like a circular argument or circular
>>> reasoning:
>>> not logically sound.
>> 
>> A circular argument is not like a circular argument.
> 
> Are you sure about that?  8-)}
> 
> I think you meant to write that a circular *dependency* is not like a
> circular argument.

You are right. I sometimes make mistekes like that when I think faster
than type.

-- 
Mikko