Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vue5v2$2asog$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Bill Owens, 60 Minutes producer, has resigned Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 20:12:19 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 45 Message-ID: <vue5v2$2asog$1@dont-email.me> References: <vu8p2b$14p16$1@dont-email.me> <vub2t2$3dela$1@dont-email.me> <g28k0kp1n7mk6lqajmgmvg2j53r9kfqd7v@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 22:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9ea6f6b700ecdca73cf4220fe89aea46"; logging-data="2454288"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/E1yIk8200vxwEcvRcSnrj" User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Cancel-Lock: sha1:leGUxy/WP1EupRIeAnsJ7WU/SYY= Bytes: 2887 On Apr 24, 2025 at 4:28:46 AM PDT, "NoBody" <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:01:37 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> > wrote: > >> On 4/22/2025 3:01 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>> 60 Minutes offended Trump for an edited interview with Kamala Harris to >>> show her in a less unfavorable light. In a baseless lawsuit, Trump sued >>> CBS for $20 billion lawsuit. The Redstone family, which privately holds >>> the Viacom holding company (whatever it's called this week), wants to >>> sell out to Skydance, owned by the son of Larry Ellison. The media has >>> been speculating that the Redstones are sucking up to Trump like >>> everybody else so that the federal government won't regulate the merger >>> to death. >>> >>> The lawsuit has been neither dismissed nor settled. >>> >>> Bill Owens claims he's under too much corporate pressure to produce 60 >>> Minutes independently. He has resigned. >>> >>> I never bothered to track down the interview but if he did what he's >>> accused of, I'm not seeing that he was behaving like an unbiasted >>> journalist. >>> >>> >>> https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5261067-bill-owens-cbs-60-minutes-resignation/ >>> >>> https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/22/business/media/cbs-60-minutes-trump-bill-owens.html >> >> It was yet more (successful) bullshit by Trump. >> >> This Megyn Kelly clip leads with the "dishonest" video: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=psrZhVO6kJc > > Are you trying to claim that CBS did not edit her terrible interview > to make her sound better? Sure, but that's not illegal so how does that give Trump any legal grounds to sue them? If they'd edited an interview to make *him* look bad, sure. But editing it to make someone else look good? How does he have standing to sue over that?