Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: OT: It ain't science, Rocket...
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 20:18:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vugqn6$ntd8$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vugpk2$ms5h$1@dont-email.me> <vugpuc$nq67$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 22:18:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="548e72a6de81589a0d7a64f88081552c";
	logging-data="783784"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Gy18FBDGEjDNf1wFXPsbhJzw0yQP9keE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4bGFqHoDxpccAGIVrTrE4MEbI1Q=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 1971

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>Apr 25, 2025 at 1:00:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 
>>"Democratic-led congressional committees and left-wing think tanks 
>>[were] more likely to cite research papers than their right-wing 
>>counterparts."

>>"There are striking differences in amount, content and character of the 
>>science cited by partisan policymakers ..."

>>"Left-leaning think tanks were 5 times more likely to cite science than 
>>right-leaning ones."

>Depends on what they consider science.

>Remember, this is the crew that told us 6 feet distancing was "the science".
>That closing outdoor geography, like beaches and oceans was necessary to
>combat the Wuhan Flu, that you couldn't get it if you were vaccinated, and
>that men can become pregnant and there are 87 genders (and counting).

Hey! There were merely 86 genders pre-COVID. I know you're sneeking this
in to test if anyone reads your followups.

>This is what the Left considers "the science", so saying they're more likely
>to cite science isn't really the own you think it is.