Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 06:07:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <vukhji$5u33$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vnlk5b$6l2g$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:07:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e556e771830e2a545df31a6689bf2dd4";
	logging-data="194659"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rcOmaKRC5DLWmh7CVqJ3m4i0I5rOi3ZI="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zZweLXMgPg0Hy83iUoHoZo6TuXg=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 1396

Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

>Utterly idiotic ruling from 11th Circuit to be argued before Supreme
>Court this term, likely in April. "Idiotic" is my word. The appeal was
>suggested because of circuit split. However, the federal government (is
>there a solicitor general at the moment?) opposed review, as the opinion
>doesn't affect the outcome of the case. The government's reasoning makes
>no sense to me. . . . 

Arguments on 4/29/2025