Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vulv8b$1dpr4$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: silca and Tariffs
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 14:06:50 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <vulv8b$1dpr4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <m73mf4F2j52U1@mid.individual.net>
 <ql6q0k18aqn8e6e5ptahus7kcv5knler3f@4ax.com>
 <m74sm6F8hs2U1@mid.individual.net>
 <r2iq0kdorbo1k06dq9lq3j2gihc4k26nj6@4ax.com>
 <m76tljFid0aU1@mid.individual.net>
 <m7us0k9vk1rl2r5trbi9i3dkho2bk9tn8t@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:06:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7376a270fb5e664d88ca308dd8fe7d64";
	logging-data="1501028"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++h6ZU/21o6CeqSdG0epji"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oG0kIp8DtCJ+fR2qPi06OTCEK54=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <m7us0k9vk1rl2r5trbi9i3dkho2bk9tn8t@4ax.com>
Bytes: 4346

On 4/27/2025 1:42 PM, Shadow wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2025 14:35:32 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
> 
>> Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/j_soloman/54478352605/in/datetaken/On 26
>>>> Apr 2025 20:06:30 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 26 Apr 2025 09:14:12 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://youtu.be/VKz5J5PPt-Q?si=ntPrbZPhCguTIuQM>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh of Silca does a good job of explaining how the tariffs are effecting
>>>>>> US companies certainly small ones, as ever it?s a moving target so may well
>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roger Merriman
>>>>>
>>>>> Many countries have tariffs on products from the USA. I see no reason
>>>>> why the USA shouldn't have tariffs on their products. Maybe it will
>>>>> bring manufacturing back, maybe not. The USA used to be a
>>>>> manufacturing powerhouse and the bureaucratic jackasses let it slip
>>>>> away. I don't know if Trump's plans can save the country, but it was
>>>>> definatly going to hell with the same old, same old plans. At least
>>>>> he's trying something new.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> USA tariffs used to be in line with most other countries, hence the easy
>>>> trade across countries and indeed multiple parts and so on, this is well a
>>>> trade war with China mostly.
>>>>> --
>>>>> C'est bon
>>>>> Soloman
>>>>>
>>>> Roger Merriman
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, most foreign tarriffs were much greater than USA tarriffs,
>>>
>>> https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/automobile-tariffs-by-country
>>>
>>>   plus other countries put additional costs on some USA products.
>>>
>>> I suggest that you stop paying attention to news sources that were,
>>> for many years, telling you that Joe Biden was mentally and
>>> empotionally fit to be President, when it's apparent that he was not.
>>>
>>> --
>>> C'est bon
>>> Soloman
>>>
>> News sources out of US are much less partisan indeed are levels of accuracy
>> regulations which one US style “news source” (GBnews) has attempted to
>> avoid by claiming they are entertainment rather than factual news to avoid
>> (not entirely) having to conform news standards!
>>
>> The link is incorrect UK has a higher car tariff, as byproduct of Brexit
>> and talks of a US and Uk trade deal.
> 
> 	Brazilian tariffs are far higher than on the #FAKE_NEWS site.
> Tax can be more than 100% of the price of an imported car. If you
> import at US$ 10.000, expect to pay AT LEAST US$ 12500 tax, for a
> total of US$ 22500. And then there's the importer's 20% " cut" on top
> of that ....
> 	Not many honest people buy  imported cars.
> 	Our central bank is still run by Bolsonaro's minions.... and
> they decide the value of taxes.
> 	[]'s

Goes both ways.

Brasil is a highly efficient producer of sugar, which is 
virtually impossible to import in to USA.  For the past 120 
years across every administration.

-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971