Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vumkr7$21v0f$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 01:15:20 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: <vumkr7$21v0f$1@dont-email.me> References: <oG5OP.1820195$BrX.647879@fx12.iad> <slrn100kcgb.ds7.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <slrn100kfa7.edd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <1irOP.851750$d51.585824@fx46.iad> <slrn100mumt.dkd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vuh558$11toh$3@dont-email.me> <slrn100obf3.pd6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <slrn100oj38.81kf.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <slrn100pc7f.4e7.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vujod0$3cei9$3@dont-email.me> <slrn100rnee.3vb.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <680df502$0$5208$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 03:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5f7f868ecd833ad81721cc84f725be0"; logging-data="2161679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18adHPLNRooJoaqqbAq9w+8" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:R1MgI6xD+zAP21jFH9ImgKCIkBY= Bytes: 1826 On 27 Apr 2025 09:12:34 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Nobody wanted to fix the X11 issues. The whole architecture was full of baggage from the 1980s. Consider: in addition to the graphics library, it even included a font server. Clearly the assumption was that all rendering of screen images was going to happen on the display server, not in the client app. That assumption became more and more anachronistic over time.