| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vunm2a$33njk$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking Subject: Re: OT Late night text Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:41:55 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <vunm2a$33njk$2@dont-email.me> References: <hyuPP.749627$D41.570317@fx45.iad> <809747a86949a6cc5c563a16e4c437ab@www.novabbs.org> <tsxPP.2742750$OrR5.22658@fx18.iad> <244e6658edcfa4ed915e5566924843a4@www.novabbs.org> <WVxPP.2635141$eNx6.1145565@fx14.iad> <vumdte$1rorn$2@dont-email.me> <MPG.427960333d17c3fa2c5@news.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:42:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="884ab84a4c08edab8434e0049ca72cd6"; logging-data="3268212"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/py868eUUM6gXHTU4hhMkV" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:U43FUpYCezb19rE2YVLzJcrzpzk= Bytes: 2373 On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:52:24 +0100, Janet <nobody@home.com> wrote: >In article <vumdte$1rorn$2@dont-email.me>, >Bruce@invalid.invalid says... >> >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 18:08:55 -0400, Dave Smith >> <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote: >> >> >On 2025-04-27 5:59 p.m., ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote: >> >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 21:37:30 +0000, Dave Smith wrote: >> > >> >>>> Who was texting YOU to let you know their baby had been born? >> >>> >> >>> Our son. >> >>> >> >> Oh, ok!! >> >> >> >> Congratulations, gramps!!! First grandchild? >> > >> >Thanks. Yes it is the first. We had been resigned to the idea we would >> >not have any. In fact, our son and DiL had been vising my Sil and her >> >husband and DiL had told BIL that they thought that parenthood was out >> >for them. Our son is 47 and she is 44 and she thought the window had >> >closed. As it turned out, she was barely pregnant at the time she said that. >> >> How can a woman be barely pregnant? I thought it was more a yes or no >> kinda thing. > > Keep up with the times, Bruce. Nowadays pregnancy can be >detected even before a missed period. So? -- Bruce <https://i.postimg.cc/JhVjfHY8/trumputin.jpg>