Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string
 transformations to inputs
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:42:36 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <vuob5s$3ljma$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vu6lnf$39fls$2@dont-email.me> <vua9oi$2lub6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vudkah$1ona3$1@dont-email.me> <vufi61$3k099$1@dont-email.me>
 <vugddv$b21g$2@dont-email.me>
 <0a2eeee6cb4b6a737f6391c963386745a09c8a01@i2pn2.org>
 <vugvr3$pke9$8@dont-email.me>
 <4818688e0354f32267e3a5f3c60846ae7956bed2@i2pn2.org>
 <vuj18i$2lf64$6@dont-email.me>
 <f0d3f2e87d9a4e0b0f445f60a33d529f41a4fcf7@i2pn2.org>
 <vuj55m$2lf64$10@dont-email.me> <vuj8h3$2uahf$3@dont-email.me>
 <vujfuu$35hcg$1@dont-email.me>
 <65dddfad4c862e6593392eaf27876759b1ed0e69@i2pn2.org>
 <vujlj0$3a526$1@dont-email.me> <vujln7$32om9$8@dont-email.me>
 <vujmmm$3a526$2@dont-email.me> <vujmrj$32om9$9@dont-email.me>
 <vujtcb$3gsgr$1@dont-email.me> <vuju44$3hnda$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuk47o$3qkbb$1@dont-email.me> <vuk6b6$3l184$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 18:42:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5ec6b2a55f0a6c1e0abdb1bc19cf1947";
	logging-data="3854026"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19FL2HvMlCG0u16cUtQfV8zVfMifQBdfyZbtqSnZp6i+A=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ExnksqMqLc7K1Yxr3854oTZYr5I=
In-Reply-To: <vuk6b6$3l184$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2497


On 27/04/2025 03:55, dbush wrote:

<snip>

> Let the record show that the above was trimmed from the original 
> reply, signaling your intent to lie about what was stated.


Let the record also show that RFC 1855 encourages proper trimming:

"Be brief without being overly terse.  When replying to a 
message, include enough original material to be understood but no 
more. It is extremely bad form to simply reply to a message by 
including all the previous message: edit out all the irrelevant 
material."

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within