Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vuoc58$3mt05$7@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal
 Alien Escape ICE
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:59:18 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <vuoc58$3mt05$7@dont-email.me>
References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me>
 <fecs0kp2ffpfnqiq4csmsehuloosuedh4s@4ax.com> <vuln1v$16onj$3@dont-email.me>
 <vulqgm$1ab2v$3@dont-email.me> <vum1m7$1fiim$3@dont-email.me>
 <vum3tf$1j1c7$1@dont-email.me> <vum7fa$1fiim$4@dont-email.me>
 <vumq9i$2a7ef$1@dont-email.me> <vuoal8$3m6gg$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 18:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6a1ef12e996dce64d7f9767f64bce9c";
	logging-data="3896325"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182KWLCg8MWngHQ3YykMFQ2YpLjQc9gb3A="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8RZsRQ+VV6O6NY7A4d7KIXArV6I=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vuoal8$3m6gg$3@dont-email.me>

On 4/28/2025 12:33 PM, Rhino wrote:
> On 2025-04-27 10:48 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 4/27/2025 5:27 PM, Rhino wrote:
>>> On 2025-04-27 4:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> On Apr 27, 2025 at 12:48:23 PM PDT, "Rhino" 
>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-04-27 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>   On Apr 27, 2025 at 9:46:55 AM PDT, "moviePig" 
>>>>>> <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>   On 4/27/2025 9:33 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Toss her in jail and throw away the key.  When judges pick 
>>>>>>>> and choose
>>>>>>>>     the laws they will follow while dictating laws for everyone 
>>>>>>>> else, we
>>>>>>>>     are officially in a Constitutional crisis.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   But would you want a system giving judges no discretion 
>>>>>>> whatsoever?
>>>>>>   With regard to judges choosing which laws they will follow and 
>>>>>> which they
>>>>>>   won't?
>>>>>>   Absolutely, I'd want to take 100% of that 'discretion' away from 
>>>>>> them. They
>>>>>>   shouldn't have it in the first place.
>>>>> As long as police don't face the requirement to enforce every law 
>>>>> in the
>>>>> book! With the millions of laws at the local, state/province, and
>>>>> national levels, we'd ALL be in jail or broke from fines in very short
>>>>> order.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just imagine everyone who went 1 mph over the speed limit or who
>>>>> jay-walked getting a ticket or even jail time if they are a repeat 
>>>>> offender!
>>>>
>>>> Just so long as the cops themselves are held to the same standard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> A friend of a friend was travelling in the USA and got stopped by the 
>>> highway patrol for doing 56 in a 55 mph zone. He got a ticket for it. 
>>> Ironically, Steve was a police officer at the time although obviously 
>>> off-duty and out of uniform. I asked him about "professional 
>>> courtesy", where LEOs give each other breaks for small indiscretions 
>>> but he didn't answer directly. I got the impression it would never 
>>> have occurred to him to ask. Mind you, this must have been 40 years ago.
>>>
>>> By contrast, one of our Supreme Court justices got into a bit of a 
>>> scuffle with a local while down in Scottsdale a year or two back. 
>>> (I'm not saying it was anim and I'm not saying that it wasn't....) He 
>>> insisted he had done no wrong but the optics were not deemed good for 
>>> him or the Supreme Court so he soon resigned from the court!
>>>
>>> If Judge Dugan had similar standards, she'd have resigned long ago 
>>> rather than using her job to aid her "activism".
>>
>> In a hypothetical, note that "optics" of a drunken brawl are somewhat 
>> more unseemly than those of a refugee abettor.
>>
> Maybe to you....

....and, I think, to anyone who anticipates that someday someone they 
care for may stand before such a judge.