Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Computable_Functions_---_finite_string_transformati?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?on_rules_---_0_=E2=89=A01?=
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:03:57 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <vuojet$3td7u$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me>
 <c2ad5086dba36124c070173c3e3252967df2fab9@i2pn2.org>
 <vu8g3q$v0qa$1@dont-email.me> <vu8lse$vn9b$1@dont-email.me>
 <vu8og4$13jl5$7@dont-email.me>
 <6d9ae3ac08bbbe4407fc3612441fc2032f949a3d@i2pn2.org>
 <vub168$3clpn$2@dont-email.me>
 <7ac75991b443ba53d52960ddb1932524dea8e03f@i2pn2.org>
 <40b048f71fe2ed2a8ef11d2d587c765c8fcbc977@i2pn2.org>
 <bf0ee557f7c0eba386944a4551e607895c620d44@i2pn2.org>
 <vue9im$2d7t8$5@dont-email.me>
 <09bba11868dafecb6800ba8aec152304fec97553@i2pn2.org>
 <vuej7d$2md4c$1@dont-email.me>
 <51a4be0ebc0ddc76954fd2e5ec1c5951b5f306e3@i2pn2.org>
 <vug1gc$116u$1@dont-email.me>
 <6bd35d1c5fb0d281a29dc8e56458f2b83f63d878@i2pn2.org>
 <vugl27$it5g$2@dont-email.me> <vui73e$217h6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuj0rf$2lf64$5@dont-email.me> <vukunp$i1sb$1@dont-email.me>
 <vulsm7$1bf1j$6@dont-email.me> <vungbu$2ujct$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuo99r$3jn5n$4@dont-email.me> <vuo9aq$3dd6e$4@dont-email.me>
 <vuohjk$3td7u$2@dont-email.me> <vuohst$3dd6e$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc4092dca5685a99a96dd309586b7dc0";
	logging-data="4109566"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kfxgp54Ll608IRzwRcTJF"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:obhRNzKqk+1wi7X73eUh6OC7V7Q=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250428-8, 4/28/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vuohst$3dd6e$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 4/28/2025 1:37 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 4/28/2025 2:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 4/28/2025 11:11 AM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 4/28/2025 12:10 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 4/28/2025 4:05 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-04-27 18:23:03 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/27/2025 4:51 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-26 16:15:44 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _DD()
>>>>>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
>>>>>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>>>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>>>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>>>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>>>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>>>>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
>>>>>>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
>>>>>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>>>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
>>>>>>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>>>>>>> [00002155] c3         ret
>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When any HHH emulates DD according to the finite
>>>>>>>> string transformation rules specified by the x86
>>>>>>>> language (the line of demarcation between correct
>>>>>>>> and incorrect emulation) no emulated DD can possibly
>>>>>>>> reach its final halt state and halt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a type error above. First DD is introduced as a proper 
>>>>>>> name.
>>>>>>> But later it is used in the phrase "no emulated DD" where the rules
>>>>>>> of the language require a generic name.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *This of this as an axiom schema*
>>>>>> No DD correctly emulated by any HHH can possibly
>>>>>> reach its final halt state. This conclusively
>>>>>> proves that every HHH is correct to reject its
>>>>>> input DD as non-halting.
>>>>>
>>>>> That cannot be used as a schema before you specify what symbols in 
>>>>> it are
>>>>> placeholders and what replacements can be used for the placeholders.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have gone over this many hundreds of times
>>>> do you not remember anything that I already said?
>>>>
>>>> int DD()
>>>> {
>>>>    int Halt_Status = EEE(DD);
>>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> When each element of the set of x86 emulators
>>>> named EEE 
>>>
>>> Changing the input is not allowed.
>>
>> Hypothetical possibilities numbskull.
>>
> 
> So you're hypothesizing changing the input.
> 
> Changing the input, hypothetically or otherwise, is not allowed.

Examining the infinite set of HHH/DD pairs simultaneously
IS NOT CHANGING THE INPUT DUMBO.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer