| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vupemb$pu5b$10@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:48:43 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: <vupemb$pu5b$10@dont-email.me> References: <oG5OP.1820195$BrX.647879@fx12.iad> <slrn100kcgb.ds7.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <slrn100kfa7.edd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <1irOP.851750$d51.585824@fx46.iad> <slrn100mumt.dkd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vuh558$11toh$3@dont-email.me> <slrn100obf3.pd6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <slrn100oj38.81kf.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <slrn100pc7f.4e7.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vujod0$3cei9$3@dont-email.me> <slrn100rnee.3vb.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <680df502$0$5208$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <slrn100uqtl.ju6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 04:48:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d04df55da68728393ee325291935b1e7"; logging-data="850091"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18P4Oug71nZg6HG5uS43Vq0" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W+5s64mOyjTPZ+c+qrZMyYDOYCg= Bytes: 1936 On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:51:17 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote: > When the "auto" keyword was added to C++11, it could have created a > problem for legacy code which used 'auto' in a different context. The > committee checked a lot of code to see whether it would cause an issue > and determined it wouldn't break code. This is how responsible adults > work. Why not give us an example of responsible adulthood in action, by showing us how you would fix up X11 to prolong its life a bit further?