Article <vupnq4$tbfj$2@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vupnq4$tbfj$2@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<vupnq4$tbfj$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 01:24:20 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <vupnq4$tbfj$2@dont-email.me>
References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <vt1a7f$i5jd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vti36r$g4nu$2@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvvqhmc.2eh69.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <vtjknt$1sp26$1@dont-email.me> <vtk2f9$295ku$2@dont-email.me>
 <vtka7u$2ddeu$1@dont-email.me> <CNtLP.2611170$TBhc.2589292@fx16.iad>
 <vtm71q$78l6$3@dont-email.me> <87plhd0z76.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <slrnvvvdch.3gc99.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <87cydb28gu.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <S2ULP.1346551$BrX.394554@fx12.iad>
 <vup5d4$fjmk$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrn1010nl6.2t91c.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:24:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="933fffa209b3970701b0ab21f41b243e";
	logging-data="962035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/y3SbyNmQZglYhSu+EgN0cNGw3BY+IAjQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wNhujo1k21XhzVVqWIgDOgyOlFE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <slrn1010nl6.2t91c.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
Bytes: 2150

On 4/29/25 01:10, candycanearter07 wrote:
....
> I believe the current rule for software is to consider "39" the cutoff,
> ie 39 is considered 2039, and 40 is considered 1940. I agree though,
> removing the century is a bad idea for anything that is supposed to be
> kept for a length of time.

I sincerely doubt that there is any unique current rule for interpreting
two-digit year numbers - just a wide variety of different rules used by
different people for different purposes. That's part of the reason why
it's a bad idea to rely upon such rules.