Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Ratings Humiliation for Doctor Whoke
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:05:30 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <vuqtcc$256rl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vuktva$erjl$1@dont-email.me> <c3tPP.923405$C8m7.27540@fx11.ams4>
 <vumqvc$2b7o5$1@dont-email.me> <wQJPP.425261$A71.277342@fx17.ams4>
 <vunu3k$3bdjs$1@dont-email.me> <P3XPP.431391$A71.71424@fx17.ams4>
 <vupfb6$q92v$1@dont-email.me> <vuq6pc$1gck0$1@dont-email.me>
 <g93QP.1647741$NN2a.1032060@fx15.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1bd986761b1c13adadd05792e7c7cec3";
	logging-data="2268021"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eD9mA/gccBJ1jzMsxEKacfhgIzOutiiY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q/s9oSjYbnFUN19HmnvTA+c5gcY=
In-Reply-To: <g93QP.1647741$NN2a.1032060@fx15.ams4>
Content-Language: en-GB

On 29/04/2025 12:58, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
> On 4/29/2025 04:39, Daniel70 wrote:
> 
>>>
>> Isn't this (just about) a direct re-post of a previous post by YOU, 
>> Aggy?? Is YOUR memory failing YOU, Aggy??
> 
> No, this is typical Aggy methodology.  When he's challenged, and proven 

This is typical woke methodology. When posed with questions concerninig 
morality and justifying something that contradicts their ideology they 
refuse to answer and obfuscate.

> wrong repeatedly by everybody, he repeats the same thing over and over 
> as if that's going to change anything.  Remember the saying, "Insanity 
> is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result".
> 
Still too scared to answer my questions you sick degenerate pervert?

Do you deny that the lead character was written to sexually harass other 
characters by repeatedly calling them 'babes' despite being told to 
desist? Do you think that this kind of behaviour is a suitable example 
to set to viewers? Do you think that children should call other children 
'babes'? What do you believe that this kind of behaviour would imply?

Do you deny that the lead character suggested that his companion's mum 
should be allowed to whistle up his behind? The direct quote from the 
episodes is "and your mum can whistle up my behind". This can easily be 
found in the iPlayer recording so anyone can check and confirm it?

Do you not believe that this also constitutes sexual harassment of the 
companion and their mother?

Do you think that this kind of disgusting behaviour should be portrayed 
on television, especially in a family TV show directed at children?

Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to call others 'babes'?

Would you encourage a child you are responsible for to suggest to others 
that they should whistle up or even at their behinds?

What do you think that engaging in such behaviour would result in, 
especially if a female child carried it out towards an adult male?

Do you think that this kind of behaviour even by an adult, behaviour 
which amounts to sexual harassment, and child abuse, is acceptable?

Do you think the degenerate perverted writers that wrote this disgusting 
dialogue and encouraged this kind of disgusting behaviour should keep 
their jobs? Do you not think that they should be sacked? If not why not?

If you didn't answer each question with the truth then you've lost the 
argument.

-- 
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it 
stands for." -William Shatner