Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal
 Alien Escape ICE
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:26:27 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vurcll$2itc2$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vulmht$16onj$1@dont-email.me>
 <u9pu0kd8dpukc01msojdo8aejbtagf156k@4ax.com> <vuobce$3mt05$3@dont-email.me>
 <vuoe7b$3q512$1@dont-email.me> <vuokr3$3vm1j$3@dont-email.me>
 <aie11kth7ppnoleoumctor47v6stvqvl31@4ax.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 22:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a067a7f60e367858ae77b13f59396025";
	logging-data="2717058"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EcnhbAfXgZJ7z86qK0pvuxAUUJrdSrOQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1VV5LLzMCsIHfWHJOe9eb+VgUQ4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <aie11kth7ppnoleoumctor47v6stvqvl31@4ax.com>
Bytes: 2364

On 4/29/2025 7:39 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:27:29 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/28/2025 1:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Apr 28, 2025 at 9:46:04 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>    On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 12:38:20 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Why not?  Without a valid warrant, what gives them more rights than you?
>>>>>    
>>>>>    Show us the warrant was invalid before you proceed with this course of
>>>>>    "logic".
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, I think there was a judge who said it was improper...
>>>
>>> And we all know state court judges are experts on federal law, procedure, and
>>> warrants...
>>
>> Yes, she *could* have been deliberately lying.  But that's a *theory*.
>>
> 
> Well since that case was not before her to render a ruling her opinion
> means...nothing.

If someone makes demands of you and you can see their authority is 
bogus, you've no reason to comply.