| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vurpjq$2ut4u$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Grand Apagon - Electricity (not) in Spain Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:07:10 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 40 Message-ID: <vurpjq$2ut4u$1@dont-email.me> References: <vuqgef$1of93$1@dont-email.me> <vuqogf$1vlqj$1@dont-email.me> <vuqq0c$217v6$1@dont-email.me> <vur3l4$2avav$1@dont-email.me> <vur9g9$2glaf$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 02:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c3950f48bb4044cf2ff1ab314334dc69"; logging-data="3110046"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186t2J2or1oEdOhJSBBCba7" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZxXp6ZC7IygSX9OZntuEcyqitgA= In-Reply-To: <vur9g9$2glaf$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2937 >> Or, just solar "farms"? > > They can drop out entire blocks of switchgear to take a given region or zone > offline (as would happen if a fault condition trips a breaker). > > The big problem on a really sunny day is that an individual house roof 4kW PV > installation in late afternoon in the UK will be potentially exporting all of > it to the grid. That is about 20-30 houses worth of electricity for each solar > roof. Huh? A single residential PV is enough to *power* 20 homes? A 4-5KW installation would barely cover the home on which it was sited. E.g., our "average" (24/7) load is about 1KW. Of course, that neglects the peaks that we see OFTEN throughout the daylight hours (night load is relatively small -- a few LED lights plus my computers) > They drop say 100MW of load or approx 500k houses @ 200W but with 2% of them > generating 4kW then they also drop off 40MW of local generation. The 200W figure is mystifying. > So the net load shedding is only 60MW which isn't enough to restore the balance > and then the cycle repeats until it hits the low frequency total panic limiter. > UK stopped it spreading by manual override dropping more than the algorithm > wanted but leaving a big area without power. Hence my comment about dropping individual loads (cogenerators). > It didn't help that by the time they did that the low frequency had put a lot > of electric trains into a disabled state requiring a hard reset by a qualified > service engineer visit and at random positions on the intercity train lines. > The guys who could do that were in short supply. "Unforeseen consequences". A reason simpletons can't deal with complex systems.