Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vus4ul$3cpns$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 03:20:54 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 63 Message-ID: <vus4ul$3cpns$1@dont-email.me> References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vurd1j$2itc2$3@dont-email.me> <vus0pr$3596d$1@dont-email.me> <vus2g0$3a8v4$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3052f01efb1c81d27b9fff120ca5aefb"; logging-data="3565308"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191Bru7Pzjb1ErjiqxPNk27" User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZVll5uGiroKG/2dczk3TYIcxWRM= Bytes: 3465 On Apr 29, 2025 at 7:38:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/29/2025 7:35 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:46:04 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/28/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Actions always speak louder than words. >>>>> >>>>> And both afford ample opportunity for (mis)interpretation. >>>> >>>> Nothing in her actions can be interpreted as anything other than >>>> violating the law. >>> >>> ...except for failing to honor a bogus warrant. >> >> Except, as it turns out, it wasn't bogus. It was an administrative warrant, >> which is perfectly sufficient for arresting someone in a public place, like >> a >> courthouse. The judge was insisting on a judicial warrant, but that's only >> necessary if making entry on private property to effect the arrest against >> the >> consent of the owner. >> >> So it turns out the judge was wrong, either because she's a state court >> judge >> and doesn't have knowledge and expertise on federal law, or, more likely, >> she >> was just fucking around and delaying things to give the illegal time to >> escape. > > Ironically, that increases the chance she made an honest mistake. An honest mistake wouldn't involve sticking her beak into things that are none of her business in the first place. >>>>>>> So, this whole action was all about taking down a known "activist"... >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it is about arresting a judge who broke the law by letting an >>>>>> accused criminal loose from her court. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. 'Accused' is different from 'convicted', you see... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Which has NOTHING to do with what I said. >>> >>> What you said is that an *accused* criminal should be locked up. >> >> No, he didn't. He said an accused criminal should not be helped to escape >> law >> enforcement by a judge who is sworn to uphold the law. > > As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's biases. I.e., > he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be. I wouldn't be entitled to a judge running cover for me while she directs me to a back door to evade the cops, either.