Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vus4ul$3cpns$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 03:20:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <vus4ul$3cpns$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vurd1j$2itc2$3@dont-email.me> <vus0pr$3596d$1@dont-email.me> <vus2g0$3a8v4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 05:20:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3052f01efb1c81d27b9fff120ca5aefb";
	logging-data="3565308"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191Bru7Pzjb1ErjiqxPNk27"
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZVll5uGiroKG/2dczk3TYIcxWRM=
Bytes: 3465

On Apr 29, 2025 at 7:38:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>  On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>  On 4/29/2025 7:35 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>    On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:46:04 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>    wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>>    On 4/28/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    Actions always speak louder than words.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    And both afford ample opportunity for (mis)interpretation.
>>>>    
>>>>    Nothing in her actions can be interpreted as anything other than
>>>>    violating the law.
>>> 
>>>  ...except for failing to honor a bogus warrant.
>>  
>>  Except, as it turns out, it wasn't bogus. It was an administrative warrant,
>>  which is perfectly sufficient for arresting someone in a public place, like
>> a
>>  courthouse. The judge was insisting on a judicial warrant, but that's only
>>  necessary if making entry on private property to effect the arrest against
>> the
>>  consent of the owner.
>>  
>>  So it turns out the judge was wrong, either because she's a state court
>> judge
>>  and doesn't have knowledge and expertise on federal law, or, more likely,
>> she
>>  was just fucking around and delaying things to give the illegal time to
>>  escape.
> 
> Ironically, that increases the chance she made an honest mistake.

An honest mistake wouldn't involve sticking her beak into things that are none
of her business in the first place.

>>>>>>>    So, this whole action was all about taking down a known "activist"...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    No, it is about arresting a judge who broke the law by letting an
>>>>>>    accused criminal loose from her court.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Yes.  'Accused' is different from 'convicted', you see...
>>>>> 
>>>>    
>>>>    Which has  NOTHING to do with what I said.
>>> 
>>>  What you said is that an *accused* criminal should be locked up.
>>  
>>  No, he didn't. He said an accused criminal should not be helped to escape
>> law
>>  enforcement by a judge who is sworn to uphold the law.
> 
> As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's biases.  I.e., 
> he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be.

I wouldn't be entitled to a judge running cover for me while she directs me to
a back door to evade the cops, either.