Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vusr62$guj$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Rationale for aligning data on even bytes in a Unix shell file? Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:40:17 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <vusr62$guj$1@dont-email.me> References: <vuih43$2agfa$1@dont-email.me> <vun04h$2fjrn$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vun1nh$22hc5$3@dont-email.me> <vunak2$2p980$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vunbgo$2q5u8$1@dont-email.me> <vunbjg$2q72n$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vunhtp$301lb$1@dont-email.me> <vunib4$308ou$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vunilp$30n57$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vcMPP.1383459$f81.136711@fx48.iad> <vuobu5$3o38b$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <SxOPP.2986762$t84d.1636746@fx11.iad> <20250428203634.00006e09@yahoo.com> <20250428112132.197@kylheku.com> <20250428222914.0000021c@yahoo.com> <vupuv9$19hk1$3@dont-email.me> <vuq06s$1ajdb$1@dont-email.me> <20250429111750.00004055@yahoo.com> <vurvqv$34gfq$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:40:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="45340a6135db254d7333a1d725247022"; logging-data="17363"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Bt7y1ERqa5k9vIH/eZ8ic" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:5XjEGqCmcuQ1bZfNFaBEh08fd5I= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 In-Reply-To: <vurvqv$34gfq$3@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2725 On 30.04.2025 03:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:17:50 +0300, Michael S wrote: > >> z/Os is alive and in good shape, but everybody knows that despite >> the trademark it is not similar to Unix. > > Just goes to show the worthlessness of the “Unix” name nowadays. "UNIX" has a meaning that varied historically. But "Unix" is commonly used as a name for the family of "UNIX-like" systems; that's very useful since it allows to formulate commonalities of this OS family.[*] Janis [*] As we've seen in the discussion of Unix file systems with its basic structure of being built by sequences of octets[**] and having two distinguished characters '\0' and '/'. [**] BTW; does anyone know how e.g. the [historic] Borroughs Unix systems with their 9 bit/36 bit architecture had their file systems defined (w.r.t. the octet transfer syntax)?