Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vusv28$40ra$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Rationale for aligning data on even bytes in a Unix shell file? Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:46:30 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <vusv28$40ra$1@dont-email.me> References: <vuih43$2agfa$1@dont-email.me> <vun04h$2fjrn$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vun1nh$22hc5$3@dont-email.me> <vunak2$2p980$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vunbgo$2q5u8$1@dont-email.me> <vunbjg$2q72n$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vunhtp$301lb$1@dont-email.me> <vunib4$308ou$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vunilp$30n57$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <vcMPP.1383459$f81.136711@fx48.iad> <vuobu5$3o38b$2@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <SxOPP.2986762$t84d.1636746@fx11.iad> <20250428203634.00006e09@yahoo.com> <vupvph$1a961$1@dont-email.me> <vurvru$34gfq$4@dont-email.me> <vusiqn$3ov7j$1@dont-email.me> <vuskeh$3p7jv$1@dont-email.me> <vusp6a$3ulkn$1@dont-email.me> <vustqu$2ga6$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b554373312cb846ab75b9a5dacf40bd"; logging-data="131946"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FgqCk67KXqBD7kSEAR4Fc" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:/daQxFvCiWJ/dW4NceiO7RWvvto= In-Reply-To: <vustqu$2ga6$2@dont-email.me> X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Bytes: 2977 On 30.04.2025 12:25, David Brown wrote: > On 30/04/2025 11:06, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote: >> >> I've seen on more than one occasion C++ (not C yet) projects where there >> were 2 files only different in case, eg: Network.cpp and network.cpp >> where >> the former would be the class and the latter would be procedural >> support code. > > I'd question the wisdom of such a convention. I'd rather have clearer > separation of the filenames, or perhaps use different directories, > aiming to make it hard to mix up the names. But maybe it is an > appropriate choice in some situations - perhaps alternative naming > schemes were considered worse in other ways. I recall similar situations in our C++ contexts where name suffixes were used (like "_util", "_aux", or similar) to disambiguate them. I don't think it's a good idea to use the same names and resolve them by organizing them through different directories only. I recall we had used regularly -I compiler flags and I don't want to imagine the hassle with same file names located in different directories. Janis