Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vutdrd$gmbi$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string
 transformations to inputs VERIFIED FACT
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 09:58:52 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <vutdrd$gmbi$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vu6lnf$39fls$2@dont-email.me> <vuj18i$2lf64$6@dont-email.me>
 <f0d3f2e87d9a4e0b0f445f60a33d529f41a4fcf7@i2pn2.org>
 <vuj55m$2lf64$10@dont-email.me> <vuj8h3$2uahf$3@dont-email.me>
 <vujfuu$35hcg$1@dont-email.me>
 <65dddfad4c862e6593392eaf27876759b1ed0e69@i2pn2.org>
 <vujlj0$3a526$1@dont-email.me> <vujln7$32om9$8@dont-email.me>
 <vujmmm$3a526$2@dont-email.me> <vujmrj$32om9$9@dont-email.me>
 <vujtcb$3gsgr$1@dont-email.me> <vuju44$3hnda$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuk47o$3qkbb$1@dont-email.me> <vuk6b6$3l184$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuls34$1bf1j$4@dont-email.me> <vun87k$2m24h$2@dont-email.me>
 <vunb06$2fjjl$5@dont-email.me> <vuo57j$3h5l9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vuoath$3ljma$1@dont-email.me> <vuohgi$3td7u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuonh6$2g74$2@dont-email.me> <vupeor$qf60$1@dont-email.me>
 <vupu0r$18vrc$1@dont-email.me> <vuqj5u$1rljg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuqrgb$23cfh$1@dont-email.me> <vuravu$2hkih$2@dont-email.me>
 <98c0a6a5014472ed9fe2d160eaa0c0ab760da5ee@i2pn2.org>
 <vuseja$3k8l9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:58:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="513b7ff7137ccbc73f1df5ad6a929a2f";
	logging-data="547186"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Xa0wLXLBaEkIoO+J/oxnz"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Seeo14+GE8ZiRDDV8okvBQWdp/Q=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250430-2, 4/30/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vuseja$3k8l9$1@dont-email.me>

On 4/30/2025 1:05 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 30/04/2025 03:45, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 4/29/25 3:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 4/29/2025 10:33 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 29.apr.2025 om 15:11 schreef olcott:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>>>> No H can possibly see the behavior of P(D)
>>>>> when-so-ever D has defined a pathological
>>>>> relationship with H this 
>>>>
>>>> makes it impossible for H to see the behaviour of P(D).
>>>> The behaviour of P(D) does not change, but H does not see it.
>>>
>>> H MUST REPORT ON THE BEHAVIOR THAT IT DOES SEE
>>>
>>
>> No, it must report on the behavior that exists.
>>
>> It is only ABLE to correctly report on behavior it can "see", but 
>> there is no structural restriction that says we can't ask it about 
>> something that it can't see.
> 
> Nor is there any restriction that says it can't deduce behaviour it 
> can't see, simply by reading the tapes.
> 

It is ONLY allowed to derive its output by
applying finite string transformations to its input.
For the HHH/DD pair these must be the finite string
transformations specified by the x86 language.

For the embedded_H / ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ pair these
transformations are specified by the Linz template.

When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn

Above adapted from bottom of page 2
https://www.liarparadox.org/Linz_Proof.pdf

(a) Ĥ copies its input ⟨Ĥ⟩
(b) Ĥ invokes embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(c) embedded_H simulates ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(d) simulated ⟨Ĥ⟩ copies its input ⟨Ĥ⟩
(e) simulated ⟨Ĥ⟩ invokes simulated embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(f) simulated embedded_H simulates ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(g) goto (d) with one more level of simulation

> Mr Olcott seems unable to recognise this possibility. Having built his 
> hammer, he is determined to see the Halting Problem as a nail that 
> cannot withstand being pounded hard enough.
> 
> Unfortunately for him, the problem is more like a 16 puzzle with two 
> tiles swapped. If he plays by the rules there is no solution, no matter 
> how hard he hits it.
> 
> This is why he keeps trying to change the rules, with word salad like 
> 'pathological self-reference', when self-reference is the whole reason 
> the proof works.
> 


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer