Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Judge Arrested for Obstruction for Helping Illegal
 Alien Escape ICE
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:37:27 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <vutg3n$j462$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vujb4b$2v233$3@dont-email.me> <vus2g0$3a8v4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vus4ul$3cpns$1@dont-email.me> <vus5c0$3d1h5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vus6rp$3cpns$4@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:37:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="859edda33378f74518ead6826580a468";
	logging-data="626882"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SoGEk37hiiakD9UVvDHpCZlDWg4E+43c="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MzvH38SQlwmPIvzIs2A9OnuKapE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vus6rp$3cpns$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4256

On 4/29/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2025 at 8:28:00 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/29/2025 11:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Apr 29, 2025 at 7:38:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 4/29/2025 7:35 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>       On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:46:04 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>       wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       On 4/28/2025 7:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Actions always speak louder than words.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       And both afford ample opportunity for (mis)interpretation.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       Nothing in her actions can be interpreted as anything other than
>>>>>>>       violating the law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     ...except for failing to honor a bogus warrant.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Except, as it turns out, it wasn't bogus. It was an administrative
>>>>> warrant,
>>>>>     which is perfectly sufficient for arresting someone in a public place,
>>>>> like
>>>>>   a
>>>>>     courthouse. The judge was insisting on a judicial warrant, but that's only
>>>>>     necessary if making entry on private property to effect the arrest against
>>>>>   the
>>>>>     consent of the owner.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     So it turns out the judge was wrong, either because she's a state court
>>>>>   judge
>>>>>     and doesn't have knowledge and expertise on federal law, or, more likely,
>>>>>   she
>>>>>     was just fucking around and delaying things to give the illegal time to
>>>>>     escape.
>>>>
>>>>   Ironically, that increases the chance she made an honest mistake.
>>>   
>>>   An honest mistake wouldn't involve sticking her beak into things that are
>>> none
>>>   of her business in the first place.
>>>   
>>>>>>>>>>       So, this whole action was all about taking down a known "activist"...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       No, it is about arresting a judge who broke the law by letting an
>>>>>>>>>       accused criminal loose from her court.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       Yes.  'Accused' is different from 'convicted', you see...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       Which has  NOTHING to do with what I said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     What you said is that an *accused* criminal should be locked up.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     No, he didn't. He said an accused criminal should not be helped to escape
>>>>>   law
>>>>>     enforcement by a judge who is sworn to uphold the law.
>>>>
>>>>   As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's biases.  I.e.,
>>>>   he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be.
>>>   
>>>   I wouldn't be entitled to a judge running cover for me while she directs me
>>> to
>>>   a back door to evade the cops, either.
>>
>> *If* she thought you were illegally pursued, it'd be her *duty*.
> 
> No, it wouldn't.

Sure it would, if not legally then ethically.